Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24859612›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2014

William L. Woolverton: a case history in unraveling the behavioral pharmacology of stimulants.

Michael A Nader, Robert L Balster, Jack E Henningfield

Abstract readBiographyHistorical ArticlePortrait
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael A NaderDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: mnader@wakehealth.edu.
Robert L BalsterDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jack E HenningfieldPinney Associates, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

TROPANE EVALUATION AND GENERAL SCIENTIFIC SERVICES COREP50DA006634 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HOWLETT, ALLYN C · 1991 to 2019
$30.8M
Mechanisms Mediating Cocaine Abuse in Socially Housed Female and Male MonkeysR01DA017763 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Michael A Nader · 2004 to 2026
$9.8M
DOPAMINE D2 RECEPTORS IN PRIMATE MODELS OF COCAINE ABUSER01DA012460 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NADER, MICHAEL A · 2000 to 2012
$3.4M
SOCIAL STRESS--VULNERABILITY TO COCAINE ABUSE IN MONKEYSR01DA010584 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NADER, MICHAEL A · 1996 to 2004
$1.9M
Impact of In Utero Cocaine Exposure on Vulnerability to Drug Abuse in Monkeys.R01DA025120 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NADER, MICHAEL A · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA006634NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010584NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012460NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017763NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical findings suggest that the most promising strategy for cocaine addiction is a combination of indirect-acting monoamine agonists with some form of behavioral intervention. This approach can be traced back to preclinical research, some of which was conducted by William L. Woolverton. The goal of this brief review is to provide readers with an appreciation for the experimental breadth involving both behavior and pharmacology that encompassed Woolverton's amazing career, from the evaluation of abuse liability of drugs to the use of complex behavioral contingencies to better model the human condition. We begin with Woolverton's research using simple and complex schedules of reinforcement to evaluate abuse liability and how that has impacted current animal models. We also discuss his use of cocaine vs. food choice schedules of reinforcement as a model to evaluate potential medications for treating cocaine use disorders. Woolverton concluded that drug taking behavior was not "impulsive" and "out of control" as has often been proposed, but rather directly determined by the environmental contingencies and the context of its availability, providing a nuanced understanding of drug-behavior interactions. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsChoice BehaviorCocaineDisease Models, AnimalDopamineHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyNeuropharmacologySelf AdministrationSubstance-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineDopamineCocaineDopamineDrug choiceDrug self-administrationRhesus monkey

Identifiers

PMID24859612
PMCPMC4239211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.