Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24858957›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Theory of amorphous ices.

David T Limmer, David Chandler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Liquid-liquid transition and ice crystallization in a machine-learned coarse-grained water model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. X-ray studies of the transformation from high- to low-density amorphous water.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Ice is born in low-mobility regions of supercooled liquid water.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Diffusive dynamics during the high-to-low density transition in amorphous ice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The glass transition in high-density amorphous ice.Journal of non-crystalline solids · 2015
    Article
  17. Simulations clarify when supercooled water freezes into glassy structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David T LimmerDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94609.
David ChandlerDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94609 chandler@berkeley.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We derive a phase diagram for amorphous solids and liquid supercooled water and explain why the amorphous solids of water exist in several different forms. Application of large-deviation theory allows us to prepare such phases in computer simulations. Along with nonequilibrium transitions between the ergodic liquid and two distinct amorphous solids, we establish coexistence between these two amorphous solids. The phase diagram we predict includes a nonequilibrium triple point where two amorphous phases and the liquid coexist. Whereas the amorphous solids are long-lived and slowly aging glasses, their melting can lead quickly to the formation of crystalline ice. Further, melting of the higher density amorphous solid at low pressures takes place in steps, transitioning to the lower-density glass before accessing a nonequilibrium liquid from which ice coarsens.

Indexed as

IceModels, ChemicalPhase TransitionTemperatureCrystallizationMolecular Dynamics SimulationTime FactorsIceglass transitionputative liquid-liquid transition

Identifiers

PMID24858957
PMCPMC4084464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.