Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24858727›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2015

Polypharmacy in the treatment of subjects with intellectual disability.

Frank Häβler, Johannes Thome, Olaf Reis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Clinical audit of psychotropic medication use at a South African intellectual disability hospital.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank HäβlerUniversity of Rostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany.
Johannes Thome
Olaf Reis
University of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with intellectual disabilities often suffer from mental disorders or display challenging behavior. For both impairments, treatment with more than one psychopharmacological drug is common, although little is known about efficacy and side effects of polypharmacological treatment. The paper reviews studies on treatment of people with intellectual disability (ID) with more than one psychoactive drug. Many studies rely on poor evidence and are supplemented with data from our own research. Risks and benefits of different combinations containing neuroleptics are listed. Ethical considerations for the use of different drugs combined are discussed. The use of combinations of neuroleptics on people with ID should be carried out with great care, since side effects may be amplified in people with ID, depending on the combination.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAntipsychotic AgentsHumansIntellectual DisabilityPsychotropic DrugsAntipsychotic AgentsPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID24858727
OpenAlexW2094142175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.