Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24858670›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses2014

Prevention and early recognition of necrotizing enterocolitis: a tale of 2 tools--eNEC and GutCheckNEC.

Sheila M Gephart, Christine Wetzel, Brittany Krisman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheila M GephartCollege of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson (Dr Gephart), and Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois (Mss Wetzel and Krisman).
Christine Wetzel
Brittany Krisman

Funding

Validating a Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) Risk Index for NeonatesF31NR012333 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GEPHART, SHEILA MARIA · 2011 to 2011
$31k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR012333NINR NIH HHS F31NR012333-A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and significanceRisk for neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is complex, reflecting its multifactorial pathogenesis. PURPOSE: To improve risk awareness and facilitate communication among neonatal caregivers, especially nurses, 2 tools were developed.

designGutCheck was derived and validated as part of a formal research study over 3 phases, evidence synthesis, expert consensus building, and statistical modeling. The Wetzel/Krisman tool, eNEC, was developed and tested as part of a quality improvement initiative in a single clinical setting using evidence synthesis, review by internal expert clinicians, and implementation and evaluation of its use by direct line neonatal staff. Refinement of both tools is under way to evaluate their effect on clinical decision making, early identification of NEC and surgical NEC. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOMES: Clinicians can take an active role to reduce NEC in their units by focusing on modifiable risk factors such as adoption of standardized feeding protocols, preferential feeding of human milk, and antibiotic and histamine blocker stewardship.

resultsFeeding during transfusion remains controversial, but judicious use of transfusions, adoption of transfusion guidelines, and withholding feeding during transfusion are feasible measures with potential benefit to prevent NEC and confer little risk.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, ContinuingEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleHumansInfant, Premature, DiseasesNeonatal NursingRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24858670
PMCPMC4034158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.