Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24857756›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2014

Detection of anthrax protective antigen (PA) using europium labeled anti-PA monoclonal antibody and time-resolved fluorescence.

Robyn A Stoddard, Conrad P Quinn, Jarad M Schiffer, Anne E Boyer, Jason Goldstein, Dennis A Bagarozzi, Stephen D Soroka, Leslie A Dauphin, Alex R Hoffmaster

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robyn A StoddardCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Electronic address: RAStoddard@cdc.gov.
Conrad P QuinnCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Jarad M SchifferCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Anne E BoyerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Jason GoldsteinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Dennis A BagarozziCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Stephen D SorokaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Leslie A DauphinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Alex R HoffmasterCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalation anthrax is a rare but acute infectious disease following adsorption of Bacillus anthracis spores through the lungs. The disease has a high fatality rate if untreated, but early and correct diagnosis has a significant impact on case patient recovery. The early symptoms of inhalation anthrax are, however, non-specific and current anthrax diagnostics are primarily dependent upon culture and confirmatory real-time PCR. Consequently, there may be a significant delay in diagnosis and targeted treatment. Rapid, culture-independent diagnostic tests are therefore needed, particularly in the context of a large scale emergency response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of monoclonal antibodies to detect anthrax toxin proteins that are secreted early in the course of B. anthracis infection using a time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) immunoassay. We selected monoclonal antibodies that could detect protective antigen (PA), as PA83 and also PA63 and LF in the lethal toxin complex. The assay reliable detection limit (RDL) was 6.63×10(-6)μM (0.551ng/ml) for PA83 and 2.51×10(-5)μM (1.58ng/ml) for PA63. Despite variable precision and accuracy of the assay, PA was detected in 9 out of 10 sera samples from anthrax confirmed case patients with cutaneous (n=7), inhalation (n=2), and gastrointestinal (n=1) disease. Anthrax Immune Globulin (AIG), which has been used in treatment of clinical anthrax, interfered with detection of PA. This study demonstrates a culture-independent method of diagnosing anthrax through the use of monoclonal antibodies to detect PA and LF in the lethal toxin complex.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalEuropiumAnthraxAnthrax VaccinesAntigens, BacterialBacillus anthracisBacterial ToxinsBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesEarly DiagnosisFluoroimmunoassayHumansImmunoassayLimit of DetectionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Resultsanthrax toxinAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsBiomarkersEuropiumAnthrax toxinBacillus anthracisEuropiumImmunoassaysProtective antigenTime resolved fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID24857756
PMCPMC4570726
OpenAlexW2005525041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.