Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24857248›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2014

ED disposition of the Glasgow Coma Scale 13 to 15 traumatic brain injury patient: analysis of the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI study.

Jonathan J Ratcliff, Opeolu Adeoye, Christopher J Lindsell, Kimberly W Hart, Arthur Pancioli, Jason T McMullan, John K Yue, Daniel K Nishijima, Wayne A Gordon, Alex B Valadka and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and first results of a national databank on care and treatment outcome after traumatic brain injury.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trauma Bay Disposition of Infants and Young Children With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Positive Head Imaging.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The epidemiology of mild traumatic brain injury: the Trondheim MTBI follow-up study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jonathan J RatcliffEmergency Medicine and Neurocritical Care, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, PO Box 670769, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0769. Electronic address: ratclijn@uc.edu.
Opeolu AdeoyeEmergency Medicine and Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, PO Box 670769, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0769. Electronic address: adeoyeo@uc.edu.
Christopher J LindsellEmergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, PO Box 670769, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0769. Electronic address: lindsecj@ucmail.uc.edu.
Kimberly W HartEmergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, PO Box 670769, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0769. Electronic address: hartkb@ucmail.uc.edu.
Arthur PancioliEmergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, PO Box 670769, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0769. Electronic address: arthur.pancioli@uc.edu.
Jason T McMullanEmergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, PO Box 670769, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0769. Electronic address: jason.mcmullan@uc.edu.
John K YueNeurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, Building 1 Room 101, San Francisco, CA 94110. Electronic address: yuej@neurosurg.ucsf.edu.
Daniel K NishijimaEmergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, 4150 V St, Suite 2100, Sacramento, CA 95817. Electronic address: daniel.nishijima@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu.
Wayne A GordonRehabilitation Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Ave, Box 1240, New York, NY 10029. Electronic address: wayne.gordon@mssm.edu.
Alex B ValadkaSeton Brain and Spine Institute, 1400 North IH 35, Suite 300, Austin, TX. Electronic address: avaladka@gmail.com.
David O OkonkwoNeurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Electronic address: okonkwodo@upmc.edu.
Hester F LingsmaErasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: h.lingsma@erasmusmc.nl.
Andrew I R MaasNeurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat, Edegem, Belgium 102650. Electronic address: andrew.maas@uza.be.
Geoffrey T ManleyEmergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, 4150 V St, Suite 2100, Sacramento, CA 95817. Electronic address: manleyg@neurosurg.ucsf.edu.
TRACK-TBI investigators

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
Transforming Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Clinical CareRC2NS069409 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MANLEY, GEOFFREY T · 2009 to 2011
$4.3M
Cerebrovascular Fellowship Training ProgramT32NS047996 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Joseph Paul Broderick, Stacie Demel · 2006 to 2026
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NINDS NIH HHS RC2 NS069409NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS047996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients are frequently admitted to high levels of care despite limited evidence suggesting benefit. Such decisions may contribute to the significant cost of caring for mTBI patients. Understanding the factors that drive disposition decision making and how disposition is associated with outcomes is necessary for developing an evidence-base supporting disposition decisions. We evaluated factors associated with emergency department triage of mTBI patients to 1 of 3 levels of care: home, inpatient floor, or intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsThis multicenter, prospective, cohort study included patients with isolated head trauma, a cranial computed tomography as part of routine care, and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15. Data analysis was performed using multinomial logistic regression.

resultsOf the 304 patients included, 167 (55%) were discharged home, 76 (25%) were admitted to the inpatient floor, and 61 (20%) were admitted to the ICU. In the multivariable model, admission to the ICU, compared with floor admission, varied by study site, odds ratio (OR) 0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.57); antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy, OR 7.46 (95% CI, 1.79-31.13); skull fracture, OR 7.60 (95% CI, 2.44-23.73); and lower GCS, OR 2.36 (95% CI, 1.05-5.30). No difference in outcome was observed between the 3 levels of care.

conclusionClinical characteristics and local practice patterns contribute to mTBI disposition decisions. Level of care was not associated with outcomes. Intracranial hemorrhage, GCS 13 to 14, skull fracture, and current antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy influenced disposition decisions.

Indexed as

AdultAnticoagulantsBrain InjuriesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntracranial Hemorrhage, TraumaticLogistic ModelsMaleNeuroimagingNeuropsychological TestsPatient Outcome AssessmentPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAnticoagulantsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24857248
PMCPMC4283794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.