Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24856887›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2014

Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: a combined evolutionary optimization and particle diffusion model approach.

Ehsan Basafa, Mehran Armand

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fiducial-Free 2D/3D Registration for Robot-Assisted Femoroplasty.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. In vitro injection of osteoporotic cadaveric femurs with a triphasic calcium-based implant confers immediate biomechanical integrity.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ehsan BasafaLaboratory for Computational Sensing & Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400N Charles Street, Hackerman 128, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. Electronic address: basafa@jhu.edu.
Mehran ArmandLaboratory for Computational Sensing & Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400N Charles Street, Hackerman 128, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Image-Guided Osteoporotic Bone Augmentation with Intraoperative Biomechanical GuiR21EB007747 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN · 2007 to 2009
$1.1M
Preoperative Planning of FemoroplastyR21AR063815 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN · 2013 to 2014
$346k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR063815NIAMS NIH HHS R21AR063815NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB007747NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB0077747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A potential effective treatment for prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures is augmentation of the mechanical properties of the femur by injecting it with agents such as (PMMA) bone cement - femoroplasty. The operation, however, is only in research stage and can benefit substantially from computer planning and optimization. We report the results of computational planning and optimization of the procedure for biomechanical evaluation. An evolutionary optimization method was used to optimally place the cement in finite element (FE) models of seven osteoporotic bone specimens. The optimization, with some inter-specimen variations, suggested that areas close to the cortex in the superior and inferior of the neck and supero-lateral aspect of the greater trochanter will benefit from augmentation. We then used a particle-based model for bone cement diffusion simulation to match the optimized pattern, taking into account the limitations of the actual surgery, including limited volume of injection to prevent thermal necrosis. Simulations showed that the yield load can be significantly increased by more than 30%, using only 9 ml of bone cement. This increase is comparable to previous literature reports where gross filling of the bone was employed instead, using more than 40 ml of cement. These findings, along with the differences in the optimized plans between specimens, emphasize the need for subject-specific models for effective planning of femoral augmentation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesBone CementsComputer SimulationFemaleFemurFinite Element AnalysisHip FracturesHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesPolymethyl MethacrylateBone CementsPolymethyl MethacrylateFemoroplastyFinite elementOptimizationPlanningPMMA cement

Identifiers

PMID24856887
PMCPMC4096901
OpenAlexW2144584819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.