ReviewTrends in plant science2014
Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens.
Review in Trends in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed, 194 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms Underpinning Biotic Stress Resilience ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Septoria tritici blotch resistance gene Stb15 encodes a lectin receptor-like kinase.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Establishment of an experimental system to analyse extracellular vesicles during apoplastic fungal pathogenesis.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025Article
- From Recognition to Response: Resistance-Effector Gene Interactions in thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effectors of plants pathogenic fungi and fungal like microbes: a comprehensive review on mechanisms, roles, and host interactions.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- An array of Zymoseptoria tritici effectors suppress plant immune responses.Molecular plant pathology · 2024Article
- Determination of anthracnose (Colletotrichum fructicola) resistance mechanism using transcriptome analysis of resistant and susceptible pear (Pyrus pyrifolia).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Transcriptomics of temperature-sensitive R gene-mediated resistance identifies a WAKL10 protein interaction network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dual RNA-Seq Analysis Pinpoints a Balanced Regulation between Symbiosis and Immunity inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Advances in understanding the mechanism of resistance to anthracnose and induced defence response in tea plants.Molecular plant pathology · 2023Review
- Integrated Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanism of Rust Resistance in Resistant (Youkang) and Susceptive (Tengjiao)International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Progress in pathogenesis research of Ustilago maydis, and the metabolites involved along with their biosynthesis.Molecular plant pathology · 2023Review
- Insights to Gossypium defense response against Verticillium dahliae: the Cotton Cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Novel gene loci associated with susceptibility or cryptic quantitative resistance to Pyrenopeziza brassicae in Brassica napus.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- Peptidome and Transcriptome Analysis of Plant Peptides Involved inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- CRISPR/CasFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Biology, taxonomy, genetics, and management ofMycology · 2023Review
- In silico integration of disease resistance QTL, genes and markers with theMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022Article
- A fungal extracellular effector inactivates plant polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Chickpea Roots Undergoing Colonisation byMicroorganisms · 2022Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed 'effector-triggered defence' (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.