Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24856210›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2014

Maternal origins of developmental reproducibility.

Mariela D Petkova, Shawn C Little, Feng Liu, Thomas Gregor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Scale invariance in early embryonic development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Precise and scalable self-organization in mammalian pseudo-embryos.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The many bits of positional information.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Review
  13. Evolution of larval segment position across 12 Drosophila species.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Single mRNA Molecule Detection in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariela D PetkovaJoseph Henry Laboratories of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Shawn C LittleDepartment of Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Feng LiuJoseph Henry Laboratories of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Thomas GregorJoseph Henry Laboratories of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: tg2@princeton.edu.

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
The Biophysical and Molecular Mechanisms of Reliability in DevelopmentR01GM097275 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI GREGOR, THOMAS · 2011 to 2024
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell fate decisions during multicellular development are precisely coordinated, leading to highly reproducible macroscopic structural outcomes [1-3]. The origins of this reproducibility are found at the molecular level during the earliest stages of development when patterns of morphogen molecules emerge reproducibly [4, 5]. However, although the initial conditions for these early stages are determined by the female during oogenesis, it is unknown whether reproducibility is perpetuated from oogenesis or reacquired by the zygote. To address this issue in the early Drosophila embryo, we sought to count individual maternally deposited bicoid mRNA molecules and compare variability between embryos with previously observed fluctuations in the Bicoid protein gradient [6, 7]. Here, we develop independent methods to quantify total amounts of mRNA in individual embryos and show that mRNA counts are highly reproducible between embryos to within ~9%, matching the reproducibility of the protein gradient. Reproducibility emerges from perfectly linear feedforward processes: changing the genetic dosage in the female leads to proportional changes in both mRNA and protein numbers in the embryo. Our results indicate that the reproducibility of the morphological structures of embryos originates during oogenesis, which is when the expression of maternally provided patterning factors is precisely controlled.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGene DosageHomeodomain ProteinsOogenesisRNA, MessengerTrans-Activatorsbcd protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsRNA, MessengerTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID24856210
PMCPMC4061740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.