Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24855656›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2014

A microfluidic platform for profiling biomechanical properties of bacteria.

Xuanhao Sun, William D Weinlandt, Harsh Patel, Mingming Wu, Christopher J Hernandez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Single-Cell Microfluidics: A Primer for Microbiologists.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Mechanical stress compromises multicomponent efflux complexes in bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Bacterial Cell Mechanics.Biochemistry · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuanhao SunSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 219 Upson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. cjh275@cornell.edu.
William D Weinlandt
Harsh Patel
Mingming Wu
Christopher J Hernandez
Cornell University · US

Funding

Associations between gut microbiota, flagellin production and bone microstructureF33AR065348 · NIAMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HERNANDEZ, CHRISTOPHER JOHN · 2013 to 2013
$51k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR065348NIAMS NIH HHS F33 AR065348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to resist mechanical forces is necessary for the survival and division of bacteria and has traditionally been probed using specialized, low-throughput techniques such as atomic force microscopy and optical tweezers. Here we demonstrate a microfluidic technique to profile the stiffness of individual bacteria and populations of bacteria. The approach is similar to micropipette aspiration used to characterize the biomechanical performance of eukaryotic cells. However, the small size and greater stiffness of bacteria relative to eukaryotic cells prevents the use of micropipettes. Here we present devices with sub-micron features capable of applying loads to bacteria in a controlled fashion. Inside the device, individual bacteria are flowed and trapped in tapered channels. Less stiff bacteria undergo greater deformation and therefore travel further into the tapered channel. Hence, the distance traversed by bacteria into a tapered channel is inversely related to cell stiffness. We demonstrate the ability of the device to characterize hundreds of bacteria at a time, measuring stiffness at 12 different applied loads at a time. The device is shown to differentiate between two bacterial species, E. coli (less stiff) and B. subtilis (more stiff), and detect differences between E. coli submitted to antibiotic treatment from untreated cells of the same species/strain. The microfluidic device is advantageous in that it requires only minimal sample preparation, no permanent cell immobilization, no staining/labeling and maintains cell viability. Our device adds detection of biomechanical phenotypes of bacteria to the list of other bacterial phenotypes currently detectable using microchip-based methods and suggests the feasibility of separating/selecting bacteria based on differences in cell stiffness.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesBacillus subtilisBiomechanical PhenomenaEscherichia coliSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24855656
PMCPMC4104068
OpenAlexW2051992310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.