Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24855415›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2014

Paediatric pain management practice and policies across Alberta emergency departments.

Samina Ali, Andrea L Chambers, David W Johnson, William R Craig, Amanda S Newton, Ben Vandermeer, Sarah J Curtis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oral administration of morphine versus ibuprofen to manage postfracture pain in children: a randomized trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2014
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samina AliDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ; Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton;
Andrea L ChambersDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton;
David W JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta ; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta.
William R CraigDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ; Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton;
Amanda S NewtonDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ; Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton;
Ben VandermeerDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton;
Sarah J CurtisDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ; Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton;
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Children's Hospital · CAWomen and Children’s Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany children requiring acute care receive suboptimal analgesia.

objectivesTo describe paediatric pain management practices and policies in emergency departments (EDs) in Alberta.

methodsA descriptive survey was distributed to each of the EDs in Alberta.

resultsA response rate of 67% (72 of 108) was obtained. Seventy-one percent (42 of 59) of EDs reported the use of a pain tool, 29.3% (17 of 58) reported mandatory pain documentation and 16.7% (10 of 60) had nurse-initiated pain protocols. Topical anesthetics were reported to be used for intravenous line insertion by 70.4% of respondents (38 of 54) and for lumbar puncture (LP) by 30.8% (12 of 39). According to respondents, infiltrated anesthetic was used for LP by 69.2% (27 of 39) of respondents, and oral sucrose was used infrequently for urinary catheterization (one of 46 [2.2%]), intravenous line insertion (zero of 54 [0%]) and LP (one of 39 [2.6%]).

conclusionsFew Alberta EDs use policies and protocols to manage paediatric pain. Noninvasive methods to limit procedural pain are underutilized. Canadian paediatricians must advocate for improved analgesia to narrow this knowledge-to-practice gap.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaEmergencyPaediatricsPainSurvey

Identifiers

PMID24855415
PMCPMC4028644
OpenAlexW2230369686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.