Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24855338›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2014

Improving anticancer efficacy of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate gold nanoparticles in murine B16F10 melanoma cells.

Cheng-Cheung Chen, Dar-Shih Hsieh, Kao-Jean Huang, Yi-Lin Chan, Po-Da Hong, Ming-Kung Yeh, Chang-Jer Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Nanoparticles in Clinical Translation for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Ethanolic Extract ofOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng-Cheung ChenDepartment of Food Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China ; Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Dar-Shih HsiehDepartment of Food Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China ; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ren-Ai Hospital, Shulin, New Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Kao-Jean HuangDepartment of Life Science and Institute of Biotechnology, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yi-Lin ChanGraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Po-Da HongMaterials Technology Program, Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Ming-Kung YehMaterials Technology Program, Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China ; School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China ; Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chang-Jer WuDepartment of Food Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
National Defense Medical Center · TWNational Taiwan Ocean University · TWNational Taiwan University of Science and Technology · TWCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), the major bioactive constituent in green tea, has been reported to effectively inhibit the formation and development of tumors. To maximize the effectiveness of EGCG, we attached it to nanogold particles (EGCG-pNG) in various ratios to examine in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo anti-cancer activity. EGCG-pNG showed improved anti-cancer efficacy in B16F10 murine melanoma cells; the cytotoxic effect in the melanoma cells treated with EGCG-pNG was 4.91 times higher than those treated with EGCG. The enhancement is achieved through mitochondrial pathway-mediated apoptosis as determined by annexin V assay, JC-10 staining, and caspase-3, -8, -9 activity assay. Moreover, EGCG-pNG was 1.66 times more potent than EGCG for inhibition of tumor growth in a murine melanoma model. In the hemolysis assay, the pNG surface conjugated with EGCG is most likely the key factor that contributes to the decreased release of hemoglobin from human red blood cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCatechinCell Line, TumorGoldHumansMaleMelanoma, ExperimentalMetal NanoparticlesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAntineoplastic AgentsCatechinepigallocatechin gallateGoldanticancerEGCGgold nanoparticlesmelanoma

Identifiers

PMID24855338
PMCPMC4020885
OpenAlexW2010306000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.