Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24854989›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2014

How to manage mantle cell lymphoma.

M Dreyling, S Ferrero, O Hermine

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computer-aided detection of mantle cell lymphoma onAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Treatment of the elderly patient with mantle cell lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M DreylingDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Großhadern/LMU München, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Universität, München, Germany.
S FerreroDivision of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
O Hermine1] Department of Adult Hematology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique, Paris, France [2] Imagine Institute, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRLMU Klinikum · DEUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is no longer a hopeless disease. Considered to carry a uniformly dismal prognosis so far, during the last years it has been rediscovered as a heterogeneous clinical and biological entity. Such a complexity has been highlighted by molecular genetics, unraveling different pathways of cell survival and progression. Concurrently, the application of new therapeutic paradigms including rituximab, high-dose cytarabine and stem cell transplantation dramatically improved treatment activity and the introduction of innovative targeted molecules has already led to new patient perspectives. In this completely new and continually evolving landscape, the clinical hemato-oncologist might feel disoriented on what are the best current strategies to handle such a critical disease and the gold standard therapeutic options for MCL. Here we address some burning questions on how to manage MCL patients, spacing from prognostic issues to the dilemma of personalized treatment in different scenarios of the disease: how to diagnose an MCL? Which are the fundamental staging procedures? What are the most reliable prognosticators? Is there a place for watch and wait? Which are the best treatment options for younger, elderly and frail patients? Which patients are addressable to high-dose therapy? What is the role of allogeneic transplantation? What is the most appropriate approach for relapsing disease in different categories of patients? What novelties are going to be introduced in the near future? The practical algorithms here discussed represent an evidence-based approach derived from results of multicenter and randomized trials.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAgedAlgorithmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyCytarabineHumansLymphoma, Mantle-CellMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRituximabWatchful WaitingAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsCytarabineRituximab

Identifiers

PMID24854989
OpenAlexW2111259842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.