ArticleAntiviral research2014
Solid phase assay for comparing reactivation rates of neuraminidases of influenza wild type and resistant mutants after inhibitor removal.
Article in Antiviral research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- miR-193b represses influenza A virus infection by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signalling.Cellular microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors are normally slow binding inhibitors, but many mutations leading to resistance, also result in the loss of the slow binding phenotype. Mutations can also affect the rate of dissociation of the inhibitors from the neuraminidase, but the assays to measure this require large amounts of virus and are time consuming. To more fully understand the impacts of mutations on the binding and dissociation of the neuraminidase inhibitors we have developed a solid phase reactivation assay, which can use small amounts of crude virus sample bound to an ELISA plate. Multiple viruses can be assayed simultaneously against multiple inhibitors. Using this assay we have demonstrated differences in the relative rates of dissociation of the inhibitors and reactivation of enzyme activity among different influenza A and B viruses for zanamivir, oseltamivir and peramivir. In general oseltamivir dissociated the fastest, and dissociation of peramivir was much slower than both the other inhibitors. Viruses with H274Y, E119V and E119G mutations demonstrated faster dissociation of the inhibitor to which they were resistant. Dissociation of zanamivir and oseltamivir were faster from the D197E mutant, but not of peramivir.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.