Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24854830›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2014

Nonlinear analysis of saccade speed fluctuations during combined action and perception tasks.

C Stan, C Astefanoaei, E Pretegiani, L Optican, D Creanga, A Rufa, C P Cristescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

C StanDepartment of Physics, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 313 Spl. Independentei, RO 060042, Romania. Electronic address: cstan@physics.pub.ro.
C AstefanoaeiPhysics Department, University Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 11 Blvd. Carol I., Iasi, Romania. Electronic address: corina_astefanoaei@yahoo.com.
E PretegianiEye-tracking & Visual Application Lab EVALab, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena 53100, Italy. Electronic address: elena.pretegiani@nih.gov.
L OpticanLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, IRP, National Eye Institute, DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: lmo@lsr.nei.nih.gov.
D CreangaPhysics Department, University Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 11 Blvd. Carol I., Iasi, Romania. Electronic address: dorina.creanga@gmail.com.
A RufaEye-tracking & Visual Application Lab EVALab, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena 53100, Italy. Electronic address: rufa@unisi.it.
C P CristescuDepartment of Physics, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 313 Spl. Independentei, RO 060042, Romania. Electronic address: cpcris@physics.pub.ro.
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University · ROUniversitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · ROUniversity of Siena · ITNational Eye Institute · US

Funding

Neural Control Of GazeZIAEY000302 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI OPTICAN, LANCE M · 2009 to 2019
$10.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EY000302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaccades are rapid eye movements used to gather information about a scene which requires both action and perception. These are usually studied separately, so that how perception influences action is not well understood. In a dual task, where the subject looks at a target and reports a decision, subtle changes in the saccades might be caused by action-perception interactions. Studying saccades might provide insight into how brain pathways for action and for perception interact. NEW

methodWe applied two complementary methods, multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis and Lempel-Ziv complexity index to eye peak speed recorded in two experiments, a pure action task and a combined action-perception task.

resultsMultifractality strength is significantly different in the two experiments, showing smaller values for dual decision task saccades compared to simple-task saccades. The normalized Lempel-Ziv complexity index behaves similarly i.e. is significantly smaller in the decision saccade task than in the simple task. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsCompared to the usual statistical and linear approaches, these analyses emphasize the character of the dynamics involved in the fluctuations and offer a sensitive tool for quantitative evaluation of the multifractal features and of the complexity measure in the saccades peak speeds when different brain circuits are involved.

conclusionOur results prove that the peak speed fluctuations have multifractal characteristics with lower magnitude for the multifractality strength and for the complexity index when two neural pathways are simultaneously activated, demonstrating the nonlinear interaction in the brain pathways for action and perception.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsAttentionHumansLinear ModelsPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSaccadesVisual PerceptionAction–perception taskLempel–Ziv complexityMultifractal propertiesSaccade speed peak

Identifiers

PMID24854830
PMCPMC4164043
OpenAlexW2014705618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.