Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24854425›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

A signature of attractor dynamics in the CA3 region of the hippocampus.

César Rennó-Costa, John E Lisman, Paul F M J Verschure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Computational Framework for Memory Engrams.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How Dendrites Affect Online Recognition Memory.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Place and Grid Cells in a Loop: Implications for Memory Function and Spatial Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Sex differences in hippocampal area CA3 pyramidal cells.Journal of neuroscience research · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

César Rennó-CostaUniversitat Pompeu Fabra, Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems group (SPECS), Barcelona, Spain; Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Brain Institute (ICe), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
John E LismanBrandeis University, Biology Department & Volen Center for Complex Systems, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Paul F M J VerschureUniversitat Pompeu Fabra, Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems group (SPECS), Barcelona, Spain; Catalan Institute of Advanced Research (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Center of Autonomous Systems and Neurorobotics (NRAS), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

CRCNS: Quantitative description of initial biochemical steps in LTPR01DA027807 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LISMAN, JOHN E · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
CRCNS: Network Mechanisms Underlying Episodic MemoryR01MH102841 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LISMAN, JOHN E · 2013 to 2015
$817k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027807NIDA NIH HHS R01DA027807NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102841NIMH NIH HHS R01MH102841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The notion of attractor networks is the leading hypothesis for how associative memories are stored and recalled. A defining anatomical feature of such networks is excitatory recurrent connections. These "attract" the firing pattern of the network to a stored pattern, even when the external input is incomplete (pattern completion). The CA3 region of the hippocampus has been postulated to be such an attractor network; however, the experimental evidence has been ambiguous, leading to the suggestion that CA3 is not an attractor network. In order to resolve this controversy and to better understand how CA3 functions, we simulated CA3 and its input structures. In our simulation, we could reproduce critical experimental results and establish the criteria for identifying attractor properties. Notably, under conditions in which there is continuous input, the output should be "attracted" to a stored pattern. However, contrary to previous expectations, as a pattern is gradually "morphed" from one stored pattern to another, a sharp transition between output patterns is not expected. The observed firing patterns of CA3 meet these criteria and can be quantitatively accounted for by our model. Notably, as morphing proceeds, the activity pattern in the dentate gyrus changes; in contrast, the activity pattern in the downstream CA3 network is attracted to a stored pattern and thus undergoes little change. We furthermore show that other aspects of the observed firing patterns can be explained by learning that occurs during behavioral testing. The CA3 thus displays both the learning and recall signatures of an attractor network. These observations, taken together with existing anatomical and behavioral evidence, make the strong case that CA3 constructs associative memories based on attractor dynamics.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsBiological ClocksComputer SimulationHippocampusHumansMemoryNerve NetNeurons

Identifiers

PMID24854425
PMCPMC4031055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.