ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
A signature of attractor dynamics in the CA3 region of the hippocampus.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective inhibition in CA3: A mechanism for stable pattern completion through heterosynaptic plasticity.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- A Computational Framework for Memory Engrams.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Article
- A theory of the neural mechanisms underlying negative cognitive bias in major depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- A dynamic attractor network model of memory formation, reinforcement and forgetting.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Offline memory replay in recurrent neuronal networks emerges from constraints on online dynamics.The Journal of physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- When shared concept cells support associations: Theory of overlapping memory engrams.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Spiking Neural Networks and Hippocampal Function: A Web-Accessible Survey of Simulations, Modeling Methods, and Underlying Theories.Cognitive systems research · 2021Article
- Epistemic Autonomy: Self-supervised Learning in the Mammalian Hippocampus.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Dysregulated biodynamics in metabolic attractor systems precede the emergence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Regulation of gamma-frequency oscillation by feedforward inhibition: A computational modeling study.Hippocampus · 2019Article
- How Dendrites Affect Online Recognition Memory.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- How the Brain Represents Language and Answers Questions? Using an AI System to Understand the Underlying Neurobiological Mechanisms.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Pattern separation and completion of distinct axonal inputs transmitted via micro-tunnels between co-cultured hippocampal dentate, CA3, CA1 and entorhinal cortex networks.Journal of neural engineering · 2018Article
- A novel pyramidal cell type promotes sharp-wave synchronization in the hippocampus.Nature neuroscience · 2018Article
- Place and Grid Cells in a Loop: Implications for Memory Function and Spatial Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Operation and plasticity of hippocampal CA3 circuits: implications for memory encoding.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2017Review
- Sex differences in hippocampal area CA3 pyramidal cells.Journal of neuroscience research · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The notion of attractor networks is the leading hypothesis for how associative memories are stored and recalled. A defining anatomical feature of such networks is excitatory recurrent connections. These "attract" the firing pattern of the network to a stored pattern, even when the external input is incomplete (pattern completion). The CA3 region of the hippocampus has been postulated to be such an attractor network; however, the experimental evidence has been ambiguous, leading to the suggestion that CA3 is not an attractor network. In order to resolve this controversy and to better understand how CA3 functions, we simulated CA3 and its input structures. In our simulation, we could reproduce critical experimental results and establish the criteria for identifying attractor properties. Notably, under conditions in which there is continuous input, the output should be "attracted" to a stored pattern. However, contrary to previous expectations, as a pattern is gradually "morphed" from one stored pattern to another, a sharp transition between output patterns is not expected. The observed firing patterns of CA3 meet these criteria and can be quantitatively accounted for by our model. Notably, as morphing proceeds, the activity pattern in the dentate gyrus changes; in contrast, the activity pattern in the downstream CA3 network is attracted to a stored pattern and thus undergoes little change. We furthermore show that other aspects of the observed firing patterns can be explained by learning that occurs during behavioral testing. The CA3 thus displays both the learning and recall signatures of an attractor network. These observations, taken together with existing anatomical and behavioral evidence, make the strong case that CA3 constructs associative memories based on attractor dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.