ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Are current atomistic force fields accurate enough to study proteins in crowded environments?
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized protein-water interactions and torsional refinements yield balanced atomistic protein force fields.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Diffusion and Viscosity in Mixed Protein Solutions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Diffusion of proteins in crowded solutions studied by docking-based modeling.The Journal of chemical physics · 2024Article
- Review
- How arginine inhibits substrate-binding domain 2 elucidated using molecular dynamics simulations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Intrinsic Conformational Dynamics of Glycine and Alanine in Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Force Fields: Comparison to Spectroscopic Data.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- PACSAB Server: A Web-Based Tool for the Study of Aggregation and the Conformational Ensemble of Disordered and Folded Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Computational Approaches to Predict Protein-Protein Interactions in Crowded Cellular Environments.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Scrutinizing the protein hydration shell from molecular dynamics simulations against consensus small-angle scattering data.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- QMrebind: incorporating quantum mechanical force field reparameterization at the ligand binding site for improved drug-target kinetics through milestoning simulations.Chemical science · 2023Article
- Viscosity Prediction of High-Concentration Antibody Solutions with Atomistic Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Antibacterial Potency of an Active Compound fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Predicting molecular properties of α-synuclein using force fields for intrinsically disordered proteins.Proteins · 2023Article
- Structure and interaction of therapeutic proteins in solution: a combined simulation and experimental study.Molecular physics · 2023Article
- Applications of Molecular Dynamics Simulation in Protein Study.Membranes · 2022Review
- Unrevealing the Potential ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Protein assembly and crowding simulations.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Atomistic Simulation of Lysozyme in Solutions Crowded by Tetraethylene Glycol: Force Field Dependence.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Towards rational computational peptide design.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Crowding affects structural dynamics and contributes to membrane association of the NS3/4A complex.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The high concentration of macromolecules in the crowded cellular interior influences different thermodynamic and kinetic properties of proteins, including their structural stabilities, intermolecular binding affinities and enzymatic rates. Moreover, various structural biology methods, such as NMR or different spectroscopies, typically involve samples with relatively high protein concentration. Due to large sampling requirements, however, the accuracy of classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in capturing protein behavior at high concentration still remains largely untested. Here, we use explicit-solvent MD simulations and a total of 6.4 µs of simulated time to study wild-type (folded) and oxidatively damaged (unfolded) forms of villin headpiece at 6 mM and 9.2 mM protein concentration. We first perform an exhaustive set of simulations with multiple protein molecules in the simulation box using GROMOS 45a3 and 54a7 force fields together with different types of electrostatics treatment and solution ionic strengths. Surprisingly, the two villin headpiece variants exhibit similar aggregation behavior, despite the fact that their estimated aggregation propensities markedly differ. Importantly, regardless of the simulation protocol applied, wild-type villin headpiece consistently aggregates even under conditions at which it is experimentally known to be soluble. We demonstrate that aggregation is accompanied by a large decrease in the total potential energy, with not only hydrophobic, but also polar residues and backbone contributing substantially. The same effect is directly observed for two other major atomistic force fields (AMBER99SB-ILDN and CHARMM22-CMAP) as well as indirectly shown for additional two (AMBER94, OPLS-AAL), and is possibly due to a general overestimation of the potential energy of protein-protein interactions at the expense of water-water and water-protein interactions. Overall, our results suggest that current MD force fields may distort the picture of protein behavior in biologically relevant crowded environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.