ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2014
A dose-response study of arsenic exposure and markers of oxidative damage in Bangladesh.
Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A dual-index framework for cold atmospheric plasma dosing: A meta-analysis of parametric control from volumetric redox flux to redox homeostatic status.Redox biology · 2026Pooled it
- N-Acetylcysteine Prevents Arsenic-Induced Apoptosis but Not Supernumerary Motor Neuron Development in Zebrafish Embryos: Assessment of Protein Carbonylation and the p53 Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- A Clinical Perspective on Arsenic Exposure and Development of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023Review
- Metal exposure and oxidative stress markers in pregnant Navajo Birth Cohort Study participants.Free radical biology & medicine · 2018Article
- Arsenic exposure and risk of preeclampsia in a Mexican mestizo population.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2016Article
- Arsenic exposure, inflammation, and renal function in Bangladeshi adults: effect modification by plasma glutathione redox potential.Free radical biology & medicine · 2015Article
- Effect of trivalent arsenicals on cell proliferation in mouse and human microvascular endothelial cells.Toxicology reports · 2015Article
- Folate and cobalamin modify associations between S-adenosylmethionine and methylated arsenic metabolites in arsenic-exposed Bangladeshi adults.The Journal of nutrition · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the dose-response relationship between arsenic (As) exposure and markers of oxidative damage in Bangladeshi adults.
methodsWe recruited 378 participants drinking water from wells assigned to five water As exposure categories; the distribution of subjects was as follows: (1) less than 10 μg/L (n=76); (2) 10 to 100 μg/L (n=104); (3) 101 to 200 μg/L (n=86); (4) 201 to 300 μg/L (n=67); and (5) more than 300 μg/L (n=45). Arsenic concentrations were measured in well water, as well as in urine and blood. Urinary 8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine and plasma protein carbonyls were measured to assess oxidative damage.
resultsNone of our measures of As exposure were significantly associated with protein carbonyl or 8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine levels.
conclusionsWe found no evidence to support a significant relationship between long-term exposure to As-contaminated drinking water and biomarkers of oxidative damage among Bangladeshi adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.