Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24854249›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2014

Trial-based economic evaluations in occupational health: principles, methods, and recommendations.

Johanna M van Dongen, Marieke F van Wier, Emile Tompa, Paulien M Bongers, Allard J van der Beek, Maurits W van Tulder, Judith E Bosmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johanna M van DongenFrom the Department of Health Sciences and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research (Ms van Dongen, Dr van Wier, Prof Dr van Tulder, and Dr Bosmans), Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam; Department of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research (Ms van Dongen and Profs Drs Bongers and van der Beek), VU University Medical Center; Body@Work, Research Center for Physical Activity, Work and Health (Ms van Dongen, Dr van Wier, and Profs Drs Bongers, van der Beek, and van Tulder), TNO-VU University Medical Center; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research (Dr van Wier and Prof Dr van Tulder), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Institute for Work & Health, Toronto (Dr Tompa), Department of Economics (Dr Tompa), McMaster University, Hamilton; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Dr Tompa), University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and TNO Healthy Living (Prof Dr Bongers), Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
Marieke F van Wier
Emile Tompa
Paulien M Bongers
Allard J van der Beek
Maurits W van Tulder
Judith E Bosmans

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To allocate available resources as efficiently as possible, decision makers need information on the relative economic merits of occupational health and safety (OHS) interventions. Economic evaluations can provide this information by comparing the costs and consequences of alternatives. Nevertheless, only a few of the studies that consider the effectiveness of OHS interventions take the extra step of considering their resource implications. Moreover, the methodological quality of those that do is generally poor. Therefore, this study aims to help occupational health researchers conduct high-quality trial-based economic evaluations by discussing the theory and methodology that underlie them, and by providing recommendations for good practice regarding their design, analysis, and reporting. This study also helps consumers of this literature with understanding and critically appraising trial-based economic evaluations of OHS interventions.

Indexed as

Comparative Effectiveness ResearchOccupational HealthPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicAbsenteeismBenchmarkingEfficiency, OrganizationalHealth Care CostsHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisRelative Value ScalesWorkers' Compensation

Identifiers

PMID24854249
PMCPMC4047300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.