Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24854238›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2014

Comparing farmers' market revenue trends before and after the implementation of a monetary incentive for recipients of food assistance.

Darcy A Freedman, Amy Mattison-Faye, Kassandra Alia, M Aaron Guest, James R Hébert

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Darcy A FreedmanPrevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods, BioEnterprise Bldg, Rm 443, 11000 Cedar Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106. Dr Freedman is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, and the University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. E-mail: daf96@case.edu.
Amy Mattison-FayeUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Kassandra AliaUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
M Aaron GuestUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
James R HébertUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Funding

HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERS: CENTER PROPOSAL CAT. 1U48DP001936 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2009 to 2013
$7.3M
PROMOTING HEALTH AND PREVENTING DISEASE IN DISADVANTAGED URBAN NEIGHBORHOODSU48DP001930 · DP · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BORAWSKI, ELAINE A. · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
Expanding Mentoring Capacity in High-Risk PopulationsK05CA136975 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2009 to 2013
$801k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 3U48DP001936NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001930NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48DP001930NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001936NCI NIH HHS K05 CA136975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe examined the influence of an intervention to increase fruit and vegetable purchases at farmers' markets for recipients of food assistance, Shop N Save (SNS), on revenue trends at a farmers' market located at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in rural South Carolina. We compared revenue trends for 20 weeks before the intervention (2011) and 20 weeks after (2012).

methodsSNS provided one $5 monetary incentive per week to customers spending $5 or more in food assistance at the farmers' market. SNS was available to any farmers' market customer using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and/or Senior or WIC Farmers' Market Nutrition Program (FMNP) vouchers. Sales receipts were recorded for each transaction at the farmers' market to document payment type and the cost of the purchase. All SNS participants completed a one-time enrollment survey.

resultsA total of 336 customers self-enrolled in SNS from June through October 2012. Most SNS participants were female, African American, and patients at the FQHC. In total, the use of all forms of food assistance (SNAP, WIC, and FMNP) at the farmers' market increased significantly after the intervention (from 10% before, to 25% after, P = .003). Senior FMNP vouchers and SNAP usage increased the most.

conclusionInterventions that provide incentives to recipients of food assistance programs at farmers' markets are a viable strategy for increasing food assistance usage and revenue.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorMotivationBlack or African AmericanChronic DiseaseCommerceCrops, AgriculturalFemaleFood AssistanceFruitGovernment ProgramsHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansMalePoverty AreasProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID24854238
PMCPMC4032058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.