Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24853910›Full record

ReviewJournal of vascular research2014

Pericyte dynamics during angiogenesis: new insights from new identities.

Peter C Stapor, Richard S Sweat, Derek C Dashti, Aline M Betancourt, Walter Lee Murfee

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of vascular research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms of Pericyte-Mediated Cancer Metastasis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Integrin α8-Mediated Pericyte Morphogenesis Controls Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Eppur si muove: the dynamic brain pericyte.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pericytes in the optic nerve head.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter C StaporDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, Lindy Boggs Center, New Orleans, La., USA.
Richard S Sweat
Derek C Dashti
Aline M Betancourt
Walter Lee Murfee
Tulane University · USKarger Publishers (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

The role of the CMV-associated reactive oxygen species in age-relatedP20GM103629 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI JAZWINSKI, S MICHAL · 2012 to 2021
$22.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5-P20GM103629-02NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapies aimed at manipulating the microcirculation require the ability to control angiogenesis, defined as the sprouting of new capillaries from existing vessels. Blocking angiogenesis would be beneficial in many pathologies (e.g. cancer, retinopathies and rheumatoid arthritis). In others (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke and hypertension), promoting angiogenesis would be desirable. We know that vascular pericytes elongate around endothelial cells (ECs) and are functionally associated with regulating vessel stabilization, vessel diameter and EC proliferation. During angiogenesis, bidirectional pericyte-EC signaling is critical for capillary sprout formation. Observations of pericytes leading capillary sprouts also implicate their role in EC guidance. As such, pericytes have recently emerged as a therapeutic target to promote or inhibit angiogenesis. Advancing our basic understanding of pericytes and developing pericyte-related therapies are challenged, like in many other fields, by questions regarding cell identity. This review article discusses what we know about pericyte phenotypes and the opportunity to advance our understanding by defining the specific pericyte cell populations involved in capillary sprouting.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicAnimalsAntigensBiomarkersCapillariesCell MovementChick EmbryoChondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4Endothelial CellsHumansMiceMicrocirculationNeovascularization, PhysiologicPericytesPhenotypeProteoglycansAntigensBiomarkersChondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4ProteoglycansTubulin

Identifiers

PMID24853910
PMCPMC4149862
OpenAlexW2071867975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.