Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24853850›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014

Outcome and complications of endoscopic balloon dilatations in various types of ileocaecal and colonic stenosis in patients with Crohn's disease.

Alexander F Hagel, Anna Hahn, Wolfgang Dauth, Klaus Matzel, Peter C Konturek, Markus F Neurath, Martin Raithel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Imaging of Strictures in Crohn's Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Endoscopic management of Crohn's strictures.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander F HagelDepartment of Medicine I, University of Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany, alexander.hagel@uk-erlangen.de.
Anna Hahn
Wolfgang Dauth
Klaus Matzel
Peter C Konturek
Markus F Neurath
Martin Raithel
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEInstitut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe examined the outcome and the complications of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) of ileocaecal and colonic strictures due to Crohn's disease.

methodsWe examined 237 dilatation procedures in 77 patients with symptomatic ileocaecal and colonic stenosis regarding outcome, individual perforation risk, the need for further interventions, and other complications within a 10 years observation period.

resultsIn 50 of 77 patients (64.9%), endoscopic dilatation procedures were successful within a median follow-up period of 24 months (25th and 75th percentile 10-38.5 months). Thirty five patients (45.5%) were successfully dilated with only one endoscopic procedure, while the remaining patients required two or more EBDs. Albeit the EBD, 27 patients of the whole cohort (35.1%) underwent surgical repair of the stenosis in due course. Overall complication rate was 7.6%, with postdilatation bleeding in 1.7% and abdominal pain longer than 24 h in 4.2%. Perforation occurred in 4 of 77 patients (5.2%), resulting in a perforation rate of 1.7% per intervention, or, more importantly, for the individual patient in a long-term perforation rate of 5.2% per patient, respectively. DISCUSSION: Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is a safe and effective approach to ileocaecal and colonic stenosis in approximately 65% of Crohn's disease patients. Even in case of recurrence, further endoscopic treatments can be undertaken. The perforation rate depending on the number of interventions is low, but for the individual patient a cumulative per patient perforation risk of 5.2% in the long-term should be considered during patient information and decisions for or against surgical interventions.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAdultAgedCecal DiseasesColonic DiseasesConstriction, PathologicCrohn DiseaseDilatationEndoscopyFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansIleal DiseasesIntestinal PerforationMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24853850
OpenAlexW1984740650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.