Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24853842›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014

Preoperative re-endoscopy in colorectal cancer patients: an institutional experience and analysis of influencing factors.

Thamer Al Abbasi, Fady Saleh, Timothy D Jackson, Allan Okrainec, Fayez A Quereshy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preoperative repeat endoscopy for colorectal cancer: What is its role and when is it necessary?Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thamer Al AbbasiDivision of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, thamer.alabbasi@gmail.com.
Fady Saleh
Timothy D Jackson
Allan Okrainec
Fayez A Quereshy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study serves to establish the re-endoscopy rate in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) at a tertiary academic center and to identify significant factors that may influence the decision for preoperative re-endoscopy.

methodsA retrospective review of 341 consecutive patients undergoing elective surgical resection for CRC was performed from January 2008 to December 2011. Descriptive statistics were used to define the patient population and to establish the institutional re-endoscopy rate. In order to identify factors associated with re-endoscopy, univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using the chi square test and logistic regression modeling.

resultsPatients within the two comparison groups had similar demographic profiles. Excluding patients where the primary endoscopist was the operating surgeon, 121 of 299 patients (40.5%) underwent re-endoscopy. The most common reasons for re-endoscopy included tattooing of the lesion in 55 patients (45.5%), surgical planning in 43 (35.5%), and repeated therapeutic attempts in 11 (9%). Significant factors associated with re-endoscopy included left-sided colon cancers (compared to right-sided lesions, P < 0.001), planned laparoscopic procedures (P = 0.011), and the absence of a tattoo on the first colonoscopy (P = 0.010). There was also a trend toward a reduction in re-endoscopy if the operating surgeon was consulted at the time of the initial endoscopy (P = 0.085). There was a clear trend toward increased laparoscopic procedures over the duration of the study (P < 0.001). Although this did not correlate with an increase in re-endoscopy, it did coincide with a significant increase in preoperative tattooing at the first colonoscopy (P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe repeat preoperative endoscopy rate in CRC patients was 40.5%. Re-endoscopy was associated with an initial failure to tattoo the lesion, left-sided colonic neoplasms, and a planned laparoscopic resection. Further research is needed to help identify which patients would benefit from re-endoscopy and where this may be safely omitted.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.