ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014
Preoperative re-endoscopy in colorectal cancer patients: an institutional experience and analysis of influencing factors.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preoperative localization of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Pooled it
- Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.Techniques in coloproctology · 2015Guideline
- Preoperative oral fluoroquinolone antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery to prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgiePooled it
- Article
- Evaluating the accuracy of preoperative endoscopic localization for colorectal cancer: post hoc analysis of a prospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- Optimal endoscopic localization of colorectal neoplasms: a comparison of rural versus urban documentation practices.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Rates and predictors of repeat preoperative endoscopy for elective colorectal resections: how can we avoid repeated procedures?Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Repeat preoperative endoscopy after regional implementation of electronic synoptic endoscopy reporting: a retrospective comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Predictors and rates of prior endoscopic tattoo localization amongst individuals undergoing elective colorectal resections for benign and malignant lesions.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Diagnostic utility of staging abdominal computerized tomography and repeat endoscopy in detecting localization errors at initial endoscopy in colorectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- A comparison of endoscopic localization error rate between operating surgeons and referring endoscopists in colorectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Preoperative repeat endoscopy for colorectal cancer: What is its role and when is it necessary?Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2016Article
- Discrepancy between gastroenterologists' and general surgeons' perspectives on repeat endoscopy in colorectal cancer.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2016Article
- Preoperative endoscopy localization error rate in patients with colorectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study serves to establish the re-endoscopy rate in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) at a tertiary academic center and to identify significant factors that may influence the decision for preoperative re-endoscopy.
methodsA retrospective review of 341 consecutive patients undergoing elective surgical resection for CRC was performed from January 2008 to December 2011. Descriptive statistics were used to define the patient population and to establish the institutional re-endoscopy rate. In order to identify factors associated with re-endoscopy, univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using the chi square test and logistic regression modeling.
resultsPatients within the two comparison groups had similar demographic profiles. Excluding patients where the primary endoscopist was the operating surgeon, 121 of 299 patients (40.5%) underwent re-endoscopy. The most common reasons for re-endoscopy included tattooing of the lesion in 55 patients (45.5%), surgical planning in 43 (35.5%), and repeated therapeutic attempts in 11 (9%). Significant factors associated with re-endoscopy included left-sided colon cancers (compared to right-sided lesions, P < 0.001), planned laparoscopic procedures (P = 0.011), and the absence of a tattoo on the first colonoscopy (P = 0.010). There was also a trend toward a reduction in re-endoscopy if the operating surgeon was consulted at the time of the initial endoscopy (P = 0.085). There was a clear trend toward increased laparoscopic procedures over the duration of the study (P < 0.001). Although this did not correlate with an increase in re-endoscopy, it did coincide with a significant increase in preoperative tattooing at the first colonoscopy (P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe repeat preoperative endoscopy rate in CRC patients was 40.5%. Re-endoscopy was associated with an initial failure to tattoo the lesion, left-sided colonic neoplasms, and a planned laparoscopic resection. Further research is needed to help identify which patients would benefit from re-endoscopy and where this may be safely omitted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24853842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.