SynthesisAmerican journal of clinical oncology2014
Predictive and prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score in hormone receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.
Synthesis in American journal of clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Genomic Landscape of Hepatobiliary Cancers to Establish a Novel Molecular Classification System.Cancers · 2024Article
- PAM50 intrinsic subtypes, risk of recurrence score and breast cancer survival in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients-a South African cohort study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Behaviour within a Clinical Trial and Implications for Mammography Guidelines.The Review of economic studies · 2023Article
- Short somatic alterations at the site of copy number variation in breast cancer.Cancer science · 2021Article
- Comparison of breast cancer prognostic tests CanAssist Breast and Oncotype DX.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- RET in breast cancer: pathogenic implications and mechanisms of drug resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019Review
- The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Male Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2018Article
- Use and Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Relation to the Clinical Risk of Developing Metastases in Early Breast Cancer Patients in the Netherlands.Public health genomics · 2018Article
- Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on Therapy Selection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.European journal of breast health · 2017Review
- Clinical use of the Oncotype DX genomic test to guide treatment decisions for patients with invasive breast cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2017Review
- Deficiency of mitochondrial modulator MCJ promotes chemoresistance in breast cancer.JCI insight · 2016Article
- Genetic and epigenetic factors affect RET gene expression in breast cancer cell lines and influence survival in patients.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices.Population health management · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to hormonal therapy is recommended for patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), node-positive (N+) early breast cancer (EBC). Some of these patients, however, are not likely to benefit from treatment and may, therefore, be overtreated while also incurring unnecessary treatment-related adverse events and health care costs. The 21-gene Recurrence Score assay has been clinically validated and recommended for use in patients with ER+, node-negative (N0) EBC to assess the 10-year risk of distant disease recurrence and predict the likelihood of response to adjuvant chemotherapy. A growing body of evidence from several large phase III clinical trials reports similar findings in patients with ER+, N+ EBC. A systematic review of published literature from key clinical trials that have used the 21-gene breast cancer assay in patients with ER+, N+ EBC was performed. The Recurrence Score has been shown to be an independent predictor of disease-free survival, overall survival, and distant recurrence-free interval in patients with ER+, N+ EBC. Outcomes from decision impact and health economics studies further indicate that the Recurrence Score affects physician treatment recommendations equally in patients with N+ or N0 disease. It also indicates that a reduction in Recurrence Score-directed chemotherapy is cost-effective. There is a large body of evidence to support the use of the 21-gene assay Recurrence Score in patients with N+ EBC. Use of this assay could help guide treatment decisions for patients who are most likely to receive benefit from chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.