Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24853288›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Green conversion of agroindustrial wastes into chitin and chitosan by Rhizopus arrhizus and Cunninghamella elegans strains.

Lúcia Raquel Ramos Berger, Thayza Christina Montenegro Stamford, Thatiana Montenegro Stamford-Arnaud, Sergio Roberto Cabral de Alcântara, Antonio Cardoso da Silva, Adamares Marques da Silva, Aline Elesbão do Nascimento, Galba Maria de Campos-Takaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oligochitosan Synthesized byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lúcia Raquel Ramos BergerPost-Graduation Program in Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50670-420, Brazil. quelberger@hotmail.com.
Thayza Christina Montenegro StamfordDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Center of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50670-420, Brazil. thayzastamford@yahoo.com.br.
Thatiana Montenegro Stamford-ArnaudDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Center of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50670-420, Brazil. thayzastamford@yahoo.com.br.
Sergio Roberto Cabral de AlcântaraPost-Graduation Program in Development and Environment, Federal University of Paraíba, Campus 1, João Pessoa, PB 58051-900, Brazil. pohlux@gmail.com.
Antonio Cardoso da SilvaNucleus of Research in Environmental Science and Biotechnology (NPCIAMB), Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50050-590, Brazil. antoniocardoso2000@yahoo.com.br.
Adamares Marques da SilvaPost-Graduation Program in Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50670-420, Brazil. antoniocardoso2000@yahoo.com.br.
Aline Elesbão do NascimentoNucleus of Research in Environmental Science and Biotechnology (NPCIAMB), Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50050-590, Brazil. elesbao@unicap.br.
Galba Maria de Campos-TakakiNucleus of Research in Environmental Science and Biotechnology (NPCIAMB), Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50050-590, Brazil. galba_takaki@yahoo.com.br.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Católica de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article sets out a method for producing chitin and chitosan by Cunninghamella elegans and Rhizopus arrhizus strains using a green metabolic conversion of agroindustrial wastes (corn steep liquor and molasses). The physicochemical characteristics of the biopolymers and antimicrobial activity are described. Chitin and chitosan were extracted by alkali-acid treatment, and characterized by infrared spectroscopy, viscosity and X-ray diffraction. The effectiveness of chitosan from C. elegans and R. arrhizus in inhibiting the growth of Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli and Yersinia enterocolitica were evaluated by determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC). The highest production of biomass (24.60 g/L), chitin (83.20 mg/g) and chitosan (49.31 mg/g) was obtained by R. arrhizus. Chitin and chitosan from both fungi showed a similar degree of deacetylation, respectively of 25% and 82%, crystallinity indices of 33.80% and 32.80% for chitin, and 20.30% and 17.80% for chitosan. Both chitin and chitosan presented similar viscosimetry of 3.79-3.40 cP and low molecular weight of 5.08×10³ and 4.68×10³ g/mol. They both showed identical MIC and MBC for all bacteria assayed. These results suggest that: agricultural wastes can be produced in an environmentally friendly way; chitin and chitosan can be produced economically; and that chitosan has antimicrobial potential against pathogenic bacteria.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassChitinChitosanCunninghamellaGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaIndustrial WasteMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRhizopusChitinChitosanIndustrial Waste

Identifiers

PMID24853288
PMCPMC4057776
OpenAlexW1984988677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.