Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24853039›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2014

Accessibility and utilization patterns of a mobile medical clinic among vulnerable populations.

Britton A Gibson, Debarchana Ghosh, Jamie P Morano, Frederick L Altice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Examining the Association Between Frequency of Mobile Clinic Visits and Diabetes and Hypertension Control.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mobile addiction treatment units: a narrative review.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Britton A GibsonYale University School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: britton.gibson@yale.edu.
Debarchana GhoshUniversity of Connecticut, Department of Geography, Storrs, CT, USA. Electronic address: debarchana.ghosh@uconn.edu.
Jamie P MoranoYale University School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA.
Frederick L AlticeYale University School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale University School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA; University of Malaya, Centre of Excellence on Research in AIDS (CERiA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

Direct/Observed Therapy/Community-Released HIV+PrisonersR01DA017059 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2004 to 2008
$3.3M
DIRECTLY OBSERVED ANTI RETROVIRAL THERAPY AMONG ACTIVE DR01DA013805 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2000 to 2004
$2.1M
Enhancing Health Outcomes Among HIV+ Substance AbusersK24DA017072 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2003 to 2012
$1.5M
Connecting People, Places, and Barriers: The Effect of These Connections on AdheK01DA037794 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI GHOSH, DEBARCHANA · 2014 to 2018
$863k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA037794NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA017072NIDA NIH HHS K24DA017072NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013805NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017059NIDA NIH HHS R01DA017059NIDA NIH HHS R01DA13805APHS HHS T32A1007517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We mapped mobile medical clinic (MMC) clients for spatial distribution of their self-reported locations and travel behaviors to better understand health-seeking and utilization patterns of medically vulnerable populations in Connecticut. Contrary to distance decay literature, we found that a small but significant proportion of clients was traveling substantial distances to receive repeat care at the MMC. Of 8404 total clients, 90.2% lived within 5 miles of a MMC site, yet mean utilization was highest (5.3 visits per client) among those living 11-20 miles of MMCs, primarily for those with substance use disorders. Of clients making >20 visits, 15.0% traveled >10 miles, suggesting that a significant minority of clients traveled to MMC sites because of their need-specific healthcare services, which are not only free but available at an acceptable and accommodating environment. The findings of this study contribute to the important research on healthcare utilization among vulnerable population by focusing on broader dimensions of accessibility in a setting where both mobile and fixed healthcare services coexist.

Indexed as

ConnecticutElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGeographic Information SystemsHealth BehaviorHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMobile Health UnitsRegression AnalysisSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersSubstance-Related DisordersVulnerable PopulationsAccessibilityGeographic Information SystemMobile medical clinicSubstance use disordersVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID24853039
PMCPMC4475348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.