ArticleWorld journal of surgery2014
Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Single-incision plus one-port laparoscopy surgery versus conventional multi-port laparoscopy surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Pooled it
- European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Guideline
- Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Single-Incision Combined Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy and Cholecystectomy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Effect of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery assisted with enhanced recovery after surgery on colorectal cancer: study protocol for a single-arm trial.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- A learning curve in using organ retractor for single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Epidermoid cyst of the cecum resected by single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2021Article
- Short- And medium-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with upper rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic total colectomy using an organ retractor: A case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Article
- The effect of increased body mass index values on surgical outcomes after radical resection for low rectal cancer.Surgery today · 2019Article
- Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report.Annals of coloproctology · 2018Article
- Assessment of treatment options for rectosigmoid cancer: single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and conventional laparoscopic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Postoperative analgesia using fentanyl plus celecoxib versus epidural anesthesia after laparoscopic colon resection.Surgery today · 2017Article
- Combined NOTES total mesorectal excision and single-incision laparoscopy principles for conservative proctectomy: a single-centre study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2017Article
- Successful treatment of rectovaginal fistula and rectal stenosis due to perianal Crohn's disease by dual-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a report of two cases.Surgical case reports · 2016Article
- Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results.World journal of surgical oncology · 2016Article
- Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2016Article
- Epidermal Sutureless Closure of the Umbilical Base Following Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colon Cancer.The Indian journal of surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReduced-port laparoscopic surgery is the latest innovation in minimally invasive surgery. We performed single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection (SILS + 1-AR) starting in August 2010. This study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of SILS + 1-AR and comparing it with that of conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection (C-AR).
methodsPatients with preoperative clinical stage 0 to stage III rectal cancer were included. Demographic, intraoperative, and pathological examination data, as well as short-term outcome data, of 20 patients who underwent SILS + 1-AR were retrospectively compared with that of 20 patients who underwent C-AR. Invasiveness of the two procedures was also evaluated through a vital signs diary and hematological examination on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 7.
resultsOperating time, mean estimated blood loss, the number of lymph nodes dissected, the number of lymph node metastases, and the mean distal resection margin length were not significantly different. However, postoperative neutrophil counts in the SILS + 1-AR group were lower than those in the C-AR group (P = 0.085). A significant difference in body temperature was observed in the SILS + 1-AR group on POD 1 (P = 0.028). No significant differences were observed in perioperative and overall morbidity between the two groups. Conversion to open surgery was required in 2 (10 %) of the 20 patients in the SILS + 1-AR group. The mean postoperative length of stay and recurrence rates were similar in the two groups.
conclusionSILS + 1-AR for rectal cancer is similar to C-AR in safety, feasibility, and provision of oncological radicality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24852437What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.