SynthesisBMJ open2014
Facilitators and barriers to quality of care in maternal, newborn and child health: a global situational analysis through metareview.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of midwifery-led care on pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- WOMEN's Knowledge of Obstetric Danger signs in Ethiopia (WOMEN's KODE):a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Responsive versus scheduled feeding for preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- Determining factors for the prevalence of depressive symptoms among postpartum mothers in lowland region in southern Nepal.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Use and application of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks in maternal and child health research in South Asia: a systematic review protocol.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Perspectives of obstetricians and midwives on the preference for caesarean deliveries: a qualitative exploration in Andhra Pradesh, India.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
- Women's experiences of communication and supportive care during labour: a qualitative study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Home-based newborn care program braving the brunt of COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-method study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Providers perspectives on a team-based maternal health care delivery in Ghana: A qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Building a culture of quality in maternal and newborn health: experience from the quality, equity and dignity network in Ethiopia.Global health action · 2024Article
- A study on awareness and perception about perinatal death auditing among health care workers in two districts of Karnataka State, India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Factors influencing community-facility linkage for case management of possible serious bacterial infections among young infants in Kenya.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- Barriers and enablers for implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternity and neonatal settings: A rapid review.PloS one · 2024Review
- Perceived quality of maternal care and its barriers based on women's perspective in hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- [Evidence synthesis and recommendations: clinical practice guidelines on drug treatment for hypertension in pregnancySíntese de evidências e recomendações: diretrizes de prática clínica para o tratamento farmacológico da hipertensão arterial na gravidez].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024Article
- Impact of quality improvement interventions on facility readiness, quality and uptake of maternal and child health services in developing regions of Ethiopia: a secondary analysis of programme data.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Cultural brokering in pregnancy care: A critical review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023Review
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveConduct a global situational analysis to identify the current facilitators and barriers to improving quality of care (QoC) for pregnant women, newborns and children. STUDY
designMetareview of published and unpublished systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted between January 2000 and March 2013 in any language. Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is used to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. SETTINGS: Health systems of all countries. Study outcome: QoC measured using surrogate indicators--effective, efficient, accessible, acceptable/patient centred, equitable and safe. ANALYSIS: Conducted in two phases (1) qualitative synthesis of extracted data to identify and group the facilitators and barriers to improving QoC, for each of the three population groups, into the six domains of WHO's framework and explore new domains and (2) an analysis grid to map the common facilitators and barriers.
resultsWe included 98 systematic reviews with 110 interventions to improve QoC from countries globally. The facilitators and barriers identified fitted the six domains of WHO's framework--information, patient-population engagement, leadership, regulations and standards, organisational capacity and models of care. Two new domains, 'communication' and 'satisfaction', were generated. Facilitators included active and regular interpersonal communication between users and providers; respect, confidentiality, comfort and support during care provision; engaging users in decision-making; continuity of care and effective audit and feedback mechanisms. Key barriers identified were language barriers in information and communication; power difference between users and providers; health systems not accounting for user satisfaction; variable standards of implementation of standard guidelines; shortage of resources in health facilities and lack of studies assessing the role of leadership in improving QoC. These were common across the three population groups.
conclusionsThe barriers to good-quality healthcare are common for pregnant women, newborns and children; thus, interventions targeted to address them will have uniform beneficial effects. Adopting the identified facilitators would help countries strengthen their health systems and ensure high-quality care for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.