Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24852289›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2014

MR myelography for identification of spinal CSF leak in spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

J L Chazen, J F Talbott, J E Lantos, W P Dillon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CSF-Venous Fistula.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. MR Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J L ChazenFrom the Department of Radiology (J.L.C., J.E.L.), Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York jlc2008@med.cornell.edu.
J F TalbottDepartment of Radiology (J.F.T.), San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
J E LantosFrom the Department of Radiology (J.L.C., J.E.L.), Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
W P DillonDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (W.P.D.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Cornell University · USSan Francisco General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCT myelography has historically been the test of choice for localization of CSF fistula in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. This study evaluates the additional benefits of intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography in the detection of CSF leak. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension who underwent CT myelography followed by intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography. All patients received intrathecal iodine and off-label gadolinium-based contrast followed by immediate CT myelography and subsequent intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography with multiplanar T1 fat-suppressed sequences. CT myelography and intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography images were reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist to determine the presence of CSF leak. Patient records were reviewed for demographic data and adverse events following the procedure.

resultsTwenty-four patients met both imaging and clinical criteria for spontaneous intracranial hypotension and underwent CT myelography followed by intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography. In 3/24 patients (13%), a CSF leak was demonstrated on both CT myelography and intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography, and in 9/24 patients (38%), a CSF leak was seen on intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography (P = .011). Four of 6 leaks identified independently by intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography related to meningeal diverticula. CT myelography did not identify any leaks independently. There were no reported adverse events.

conclusionsPresent data demonstrate a higher rate of leak detection with intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography when investigating CSF leaks in our cohort of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Although intrathecal gadolinium is an FDA off-label use, all patients tolerated the medication without evidence of complications. Our data suggest that intrathecal gadolinium MR myelography is a well-tolerated examination with significant benefit in the evaluation of CSF leak, particularly for patients with leak related to meningeal diverticula.

Indexed as

AdultCerebrospinal Fluid LeakFemaleGadoliniumHumansInjections, SpinalIntracranial HypotensionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMyelographyOff-Label UseRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedGadolinium

Identifiers

PMID24852289
PMCPMC7966231
OpenAlexW2159635840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.