Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2014
Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with or without cetuximab in advanced biliary-tract cancer (BINGO): a randomised, open-label, non-comparative phase 2 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 204 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial Assessing the Activity of Gemcitabine - Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Advanced Biliary Cancer.
Toripalimab Plus Lenvatinib as Second-line Treatment in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: a Single-arm, Non-randomized, Single-center Clinical Trial and Biomarker Study
Who cites it
204 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 412 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of and sequential analysis of trials.Hepatology international · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparison of Different First-Line Systemic Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Updated Random Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Chemotherapies for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma: Current knowledge and future potential.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Incidence, risk and prognostic role of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-induced skin rash in biliary cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Risk of fatigue in cancer patients receiving anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.International journal of clinical oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy in biliary tract cancer: A meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2017Pooled it
- HER2/HER3 pathway in biliary tract malignancies; systematic review and meta-analysis: a potential therapeutic target?Cancer metastasis reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Genomics of gallbladder cancer: the case for biomarker-driven clinical trial design.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Correlations of survival with progression-free survival, response rate, and disease control rate in advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy.British journal of cancer · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015Guideline
- Locoregional gemcitabine plus surufatinib and camrelizumab in FGFR2-non-altered intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Trial
144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
26 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGemcitabine plus a platinum-based agent (eg, cisplatin or oxaliplatin) is the standard of care for advanced biliary cancers. We investigated the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary cancers.
methodsIn this non-comparative, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial, we recruited patients with locally advanced (non-resectable) or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, or ampullary carcinoma and a WHO performance status of 0 or 1 from 18 hospitals across France and Germany. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally with a minimisation procedure to first-line treatment with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) with or without cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)), repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified by centre, primary site of disease, disease stage, and previous treatment with curative intent or adjuvant therapy. Investigators who assessed treatment response were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were progression-free at 4 months, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00552149.
findingsBetween Oct 10, 2007, and Dec 18, 2009, 76 patients were assigned to chemotherapy plus cetuximab and 74 to chemotherapy alone. 48 (63%; 95% CI 52-74) patients assigned to chemotherapy plus cetuximab and 40 (54%; 43-65) assigned to chemotherapy alone were progression-free at 4 months. Median progression-free survival was 6·1 months (95% CI 5·1-7·6) in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group and 5·5 months (3·7-6·6) in the chemotherapy alone group. Median overall survival was 11·0 months (9·1-13·7) in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group and 12·4 months (8·6-16·0) in the chemotherapy alone group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were peripheral neuropathy (in 18 [24%] of 76 patients who received chemotherapy plus cetuximab vs ten [15%] of 68 who received chemotherapy alone), neutropenia (17 [22%] vs 11 [16%]), and increased aminotransferase concentrations (17 [22%] vs ten [15%]). 70 serious adverse events were reported in 39 (51%) of 76 patients who received chemotherapy plus cetuximab (34 events in 19 [25%] patients were treatment-related), whereas 41 serious adverse events were reported in 25 (35%) of 71 patients who received chemotherapy alone (20 events in 12 [17%] patients were treatment-related). One patient died of atypical pneumonia related to treatment in the chemotherapy alone group.
interpretationThe addition of cetuximab to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin did not seem to enhance the activity of chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary cancer, although it was well tolerated. Gemcitabine and platinum-based combination should remain the standard treatment option.
fundingInstitut National du Cancer, Merck Serono.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.