Trial reportJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2014
Information contributed by meta-analysis in exposure-response modeling: application to phase 2 dose selection of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
Trial report in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Employing zero-inflated beta distribution in an exposure-response analysis of TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor brepocitinib in patients with plaque psoriasis.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Trial
- Improvement in latent variable indirect response modeling of multiple categorical clinical endpoints: application to modeling of guselkumab treatment effects in psoriatic patients.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2017Trial
- First-in-human study to assess guselkumab (anti-IL-23 mAb) pharmacokinetics/safety in healthy subjects and patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Trial
- PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Article
- Applying Beta Distribution in Analyzing Bounded Outcome Score Data.The AAPS journal · 2020Article
- Establishing Good Practices for Exposure-Response Analysis of Clinical Endpoints in Drug Development.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2015Article
- New and emerging biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: mechanistic rationales and recent clinical data for IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors.Dermatologic therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ustekinumab, a human immunoglobulin G1 kappa (IgG1κ) monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to human interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, has been approved to treat patients with psoriasis. Guselkumab is a related human IgG1 monoclonal antibody in clinical development which specifically blocks IL-23. The objective of this study was to study the exposure-response relationship of guselkumab to guide dose selection for a Phase 2 study in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Data were available from a Phase 1 study of 47 healthy subjects and 24 patients with psoriasis who received various doses of guselkumab. Disease severity was assessed using Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores in all studies. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from population pharmacokinetics modeling for the purpose of exposure-response modeling to guide dosing regimen selection. A population mechanism-based exposure-response model of guselkumab was developed to evaluate the association of guselkumab dosing with PASI scores using a Type I indirect response model, with placebo effect empirically modeled. The model was subsequently updated, first by incorporating data from psoriasis patients who received placebo (n = 765) and from patients actively treated with ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg (n = 1,230) in two ustekinumab Phase 3 trials. Inclusion of this additional ustekinumab data and the consequent contributions to specific model components substantially reduced uncertainties in all model components except for one parameter. Additional sensitivity analyses showed that the dose selection decision was robust to this remaining uncertainty. The described approach underscores the importance of utilizing all available sources of information in dose selection decisions, along with the importance of effective development team interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.