ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014
Phylogenomic analysis of echinoderm class relationships supports Asterozoa.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- The tuxedo sea urchinbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Comparative mitogenomics of Ocnus glacialis reveals lineage-specific evolutionary rates and complex gene rearrangements in Dendrochirotida.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A stage and anatomy ontology for embryogenesis in indirect-developing echinoderms.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Identifying sets of phylogenetically informative markers for Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prickly Defenders: A Review of Venomous Sea Urchins (Echinoidea).Marine drugs · 2025Review
- Antero-posterior patterning in the brittle star Amphipholis squamata and the evolution of echinoderm body plans.EvoDevo · 2025Article
- Enzymes enabling the biosynthesis of various COpen biology · 2025Article
- In Search of the Role of Three-Finger Starfish Proteins.Marine drugs · 2024Article
- Shared regulatory function of non-genomic thyroid hormone signaling in echinoderm skeletogenesis.EvoDevo · 2024Article
- A feather star is born: embryonic development and nervous system organization in the crinoidOpen biology · 2024Article
- The brittle star genome illuminates the genetic basis of animal appendage regeneration.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- The evolution of the gliotoxin biosynthetic gene cluster in Penicillium fungi.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Ethical Considerations for Echinoderms: New Initiatives in Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Independent rediploidization masks shared whole genome duplication in the sturgeon-paddlefish ancestor.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Complete mitochondrial genome of the crinoidMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023Article
- A Practical Guide to Design and Assess a Phylogenomic Study.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Phylogenomic analyses of echinoid diversification prompt a re-evaluation of their fossil record.eLife · 2022Article
- Developmental atlas of the indirect-developing sea urchinFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While some aspects of the phylogeny of the five living echinoderm classes are clear, the position of the ophiuroids (brittlestars) relative to asteroids (starfish), echinoids (sea urchins) and holothurians (sea cucumbers) is controversial. Ophiuroids have a pluteus-type larva in common with echinoids giving some support to an ophiuroid/echinoid/holothurian clade named Cryptosyringida. Most molecular phylogenetic studies, however, support an ophiuroid/asteroid clade (Asterozoa) implying either convergent evolution of the pluteus or reversals to an auricularia-type larva in asteroids and holothurians. A recent study of 10 genes from four of the five echinoderm classes used 'phylogenetic signal dissection' to separate alignment positions into subsets of (i) suboptimal, heterogeneously evolving sites (invariant plus rapidly changing) and (ii) the remaining optimal, homogeneously evolving sites. Along with most previous molecular phylogenetic studies, their set of heterogeneous sites, expected to be more prone to systematic error, support Asterozoa. The homogeneous sites, in contrast, support an ophiuroid/echinoid grouping, consistent with the cryptosyringid clade, leading them to posit homology of the ophiopluteus and echinopluteus. Our new dataset comprises 219 genes from all echinoderm classes; analyses using probabilistic Bayesian phylogenetic methods strongly support Asterozoa. The most reliable, slowly evolving quartile of genes also gives highest support for Asterozoa; this support diminishes in second and third quartiles and the fastest changing quartile places the ophiuroids close to the root. Using phylogenetic signal dissection, we find heterogenous sites support an unlikely grouping of Ophiuroidea + Holothuria while homogeneous sites again strongly support Asterozoa. Our large and taxonomically complete dataset finds no support for the cryptosyringid hypothesis; in showing strong support for the Asterozoa, our preferred topology leaves the question of homology of pluteus larvae open.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.