Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24850925›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Phylogenomic analysis of echinoderm class relationships supports Asterozoa.

Maximilian J Telford, Christopher J Lowe, Christopher B Cameron, Olga Ortega-Martinez, Jochanan Aronowicz, Paola Oliveri, Richard R Copley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
39.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The tuxedo sea urchinbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ethical Considerations for Echinoderms: New Initiatives in Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Complete mitochondrial genome of the crinoidMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Developmental atlas of the indirect-developing sea urchinFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Maximilian J TelfordDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK m.telford@ucl.ac.uk.
Christopher J LoweHopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology, Stanford University, 120 Oceanview Boulevard, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA.
Christopher B CameronDépartment de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Pavillion Marie-Victorin, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7.
Olga Ortega-MartinezDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Sven Lovén Centre for Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Kristineberg 566, Fiskebäckskil 451 78, Sweden.
Jochanan AronowiczDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60650, USA.
Paola OliveriDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Richard R CopleyCNRS, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Observatoire Océanographique, Villefranche-sur-mer 06230, France Sorbonne Universites, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Laboratoire de Biologie du Developpement de Villefranche-sur-mer, Observatoire Oceanographique, Villefranche-sur-mer 06230, France copley@obs-vlfr.fr.
University College London · GBLaboratoire de Biologie du Développement · FRPacific University · USUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While some aspects of the phylogeny of the five living echinoderm classes are clear, the position of the ophiuroids (brittlestars) relative to asteroids (starfish), echinoids (sea urchins) and holothurians (sea cucumbers) is controversial. Ophiuroids have a pluteus-type larva in common with echinoids giving some support to an ophiuroid/echinoid/holothurian clade named Cryptosyringida. Most molecular phylogenetic studies, however, support an ophiuroid/asteroid clade (Asterozoa) implying either convergent evolution of the pluteus or reversals to an auricularia-type larva in asteroids and holothurians. A recent study of 10 genes from four of the five echinoderm classes used 'phylogenetic signal dissection' to separate alignment positions into subsets of (i) suboptimal, heterogeneously evolving sites (invariant plus rapidly changing) and (ii) the remaining optimal, homogeneously evolving sites. Along with most previous molecular phylogenetic studies, their set of heterogeneous sites, expected to be more prone to systematic error, support Asterozoa. The homogeneous sites, in contrast, support an ophiuroid/echinoid grouping, consistent with the cryptosyringid clade, leading them to posit homology of the ophiopluteus and echinopluteus. Our new dataset comprises 219 genes from all echinoderm classes; analyses using probabilistic Bayesian phylogenetic methods strongly support Asterozoa. The most reliable, slowly evolving quartile of genes also gives highest support for Asterozoa; this support diminishes in second and third quartiles and the fastest changing quartile places the ophiuroids close to the root. Using phylogenetic signal dissection, we find heterogenous sites support an unlikely grouping of Ophiuroidea + Holothuria while homogeneous sites again strongly support Asterozoa. Our large and taxonomically complete dataset finds no support for the cryptosyringid hypothesis; in showing strong support for the Asterozoa, our preferred topology leaves the question of homology of pluteus larvae open.

Indexed as

GenomePhylogenyAnimalsBiological EvolutionEchinodermataEvolution, MolecularLarvaMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, ProteinAsterozoaCryptosyringidaechinodermphylogenomicphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID24850925
PMCPMC4046411
OpenAlexW2133495658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.