Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24850919›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Global diversity and oceanic divergence of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae).

Jennifer A Jackson, Debbie J Steel, P Beerli, Bradley C Congdon, Carlos Olavarría, Matthew S Leslie, Cristina Pomilla, Howard Rosenbaum, C Scott Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Causes and consequences of female centrality in cetacean societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer A JacksonMarine Mammal Institute, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, 2030 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365, USA British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK jennifer.jackson@bas.ac.uk.
Debbie J SteelBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.
P BeerliDepartment of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Bradley C CongdonSchool of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia.
Carlos OlavarríaSchool of Biological Sciences, Auckland University, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand Fundación CEQUA, Punta Arenas, Chile.
Matthew S LeslieOcean Giants Program, Global Conservation-Marine, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, USA Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, 79th Street and Central Park West, New York, NY, USA.
Cristina PomillaOcean Giants Program, Global Conservation-Marine, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, USA Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, 79th Street and Central Park West, New York, NY, USA.
Howard RosenbaumOcean Giants Program, Global Conservation-Marine, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, USA Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, 79th Street and Central Park West, New York, NY, USA.
C Scott BakerMarine Mammal Institute, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, 2030 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365, USA School of Biological Sciences, Auckland University, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) annually undertake the longest migrations between seasonal feeding and breeding grounds of any mammal. Despite this dispersal potential, discontinuous seasonal distributions and migratory patterns suggest that humpbacks form discrete regional populations within each ocean. To better understand the worldwide population history of humpbacks, and the interplay of this species with the oceanic environment through geological time, we assembled mitochondrial DNA control region sequences representing approximately 2700 individuals (465 bp, 219 haplotypes) and eight nuclear intronic sequences representing approximately 70 individuals (3700 bp, 140 alleles) from the North Pacific, North Atlantic and Southern Hemisphere. Bayesian divergence time reconstructions date the origin of humpback mtDNA lineages to the Pleistocene (880 ka, 95% posterior intervals 550-1320 ka) and estimate radiation of current Northern Hemisphere lineages between 50 and 200 ka, indicating colonization of the northern oceans prior to the Last Glacial Maximum. Coalescent analyses reveal restricted gene flow between ocean basins, with long-term migration rates (individual migrants per generation) of less than 3.3 for mtDNA and less than 2 for nuclear genomic DNA. Genetic evidence suggests that humpbacks in the North Pacific, North Atlantic and Southern Hemisphere are on independent evolutionary trajectories, supporting taxonomic revision of M. novaeangliae to three subspecies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationActinsAnimalsBayes TheoremCell NucleusDNA, MitochondrialEvolution, MolecularHaplotypesHumpback WhaleMolecular Sequence DataOceans and SeasPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAActinsDNA, Mitochondrialcetaceandiversitygene flowgenomicmitochondrialwhale

Identifiers

PMID24850919
PMCPMC4046397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.