Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24850903›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2014

Spaces of the possible: universal Darwinism and the wall between technological and biological innovation.

Andreas Wagner, William Rosen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Gaia as Solaris: An Alternative Default Evolutionary Trajectory.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Divide and conquer: intermediate levels of population fragmentation maximize cultural accumulation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Innovation: an emerging focus from cells to societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  9. Innovation and the growth of human population.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  10. The topology of evolutionary novelty and innovation in macroevolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The dynamics of correlated novelties.Scientific reports · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas WagnerInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland The Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Quartier Sorge - Batiment Genopode, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland The Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA andreas.wagner@ieu.uzh.ch.
William Rosen147 Jefferson Road, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovations in biological evolution and in technology have many common features. Some of them involve similar processes, such as trial and error and horizontal information transfer. Others describe analogous outcomes such as multiple independent origins of similar innovations. Yet others display similar temporal patterns such as episodic bursts of change separated by periods of stasis. We review nine such commonalities, and propose that the mathematical concept of a space of innovations, discoveries or designs can help explain them. This concept can also help demolish a persistent conceptual wall between technological and biological innovation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionInventionsModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalResearchAnimalsBiomimeticsGenetic FitnessHumansevolutioninnovationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID24850903
PMCPMC4208354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.