Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24850899›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014

Natural variation in abiotic stress responsive gene expression and local adaptation to climate in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Jesse R Lasky, David L Des Marais, David B Lowry, Inna Povolotskaya, John K McKay, James H Richards, Timothy H Keitt, Thomas E Juenger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Marine life science & technology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Climate change and plant genomic plasticity.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesse R LaskyDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at AustinEarth Institute and Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University jl3985@columbia.edu tjuenger@austin.texas.edu.
David L Des MaraisDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin.
David B LowryDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin.
Inna PovolotskayaBioinformatics and Genomics Program, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
John K McKayBioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University.
James H RichardsLand, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis.
Timothy H KeittDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin.
Thomas E JuengerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin jl3985@columbia.edu tjuenger@austin.texas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESColorado State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression varies widely in natural populations, yet the proximate and ultimate causes of this variation are poorly known. Understanding how variation in gene expression affects abiotic stress tolerance, fitness, and adaptation is central to the field of evolutionary genetics. We tested the hypothesis that genes with natural genetic variation in their expression responses to abiotic stress are likely to be involved in local adaptation to climate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Specifically, we compared genes with consistent expression responses to environmental stress (expression stress responsive, "eSR") to genes with genetically variable responses to abiotic stress (expression genotype-by-environment interaction, "eGEI"). We found that on average genes that exhibited eGEI in response to drought or cold had greater polymorphism in promoter regions and stronger associations with climate than those of eSR genes or genomic controls. We also found that transcription factor binding sites known to respond to environmental stressors, especially abscisic acid responsive elements, showed significantly higher polymorphism in drought eGEI genes in comparison to eSR genes. By contrast, eSR genes tended to exhibit relatively greater pairwise haplotype sharing, lower promoter diversity, and fewer nonsynonymous polymorphisms, suggesting purifying selection or selective sweeps. Our results indicate that cis-regulatory evolution and genetic variation in stress responsive gene expression may be important mechanisms of local adaptation to climatic selective gradients.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationGene Expression Regulation, PlantArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsClimate ChangeGenetic FitnessGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePromoter Regions, GeneticSelection, GeneticStress, PhysiologicalArabidopsis Proteinsabiotic stresslandscape genomicsphenotypic plasticityregulatory evolutiontranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID24850899
PMCPMC4137704
OpenAlexW2102930069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.