Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24849355›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

A cerebellar learning model of vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation in wild-type and mutant mice.

Claudia Clopath, Aleksandra Badura, Chris I De Zeeuw, Nicolas Brunel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Purkinje cell models: past, present and future.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intrinsic Plasticity of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells Contributes to Motor Memory Consolidation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claudia ClopathUMR 8118, CNRS and Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, 10032, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom.
Aleksandra BaduraNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1000 GC Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Department of Molecular Biology and Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, and.
Chris I De ZeeuwNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1000 GC Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands, c.dezeeuw@erasmusmc.nl nbrunel@galton.uchicago.edu.
Nicolas BrunelUMR 8118, CNRS and Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France, Departments of Statistics and Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 c.dezeeuw@erasmusmc.nl nbrunel@galton.uchicago.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms of cerebellar motor learning are still poorly understood. The standard Marr-Albus-Ito theory posits that learning involves plasticity at the parallel fiber to Purkinje cell synapses under control of the climbing fiber input, which provides an error signal as in classical supervised learning paradigms. However, a growing body of evidence challenges this theory, in that additional sites of plasticity appear to contribute to motor adaptation. Here, we consider phase-reversal training of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), a simple form of motor learning for which a large body of experimental data is available in wild-type and mutant mice, in which the excitability of granule cells or inhibition of Purkinje cells was affected in a cell-specific fashion. We present novel electrophysiological recordings of Purkinje cell activity measured in naive wild-type mice subjected to this VOR adaptation task. We then introduce a minimal model that consists of learning at the parallel fibers to Purkinje cells with the help of the climbing fibers. Although the minimal model reproduces the behavior of the wild-type animals and is analytically tractable, it fails at reproducing the behavior of mutant mice and the electrophysiology data. Therefore, we build a detailed model involving plasticity at the parallel fibers to Purkinje cells' synapse guided by climbing fibers, feedforward inhibition of Purkinje cells, and plasticity at the mossy fiber to vestibular nuclei neuron synapse. The detailed model reproduces both the behavioral and electrophysiological data of both the wild-type and mutant mice and allows for experimentally testable predictions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsCerebellumComputer SimulationEye MovementsK Cl- CotransportersLearningMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Mutant StrainsMice, TransgenicMutationNonlinear DynamicsPurkinje CellsGabrb2 protein, mouseK Cl- CotransportersReceptors, GABAReceptors, GABA-ASymporters

Identifiers

PMID24849355
PMCPMC6608186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.