Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24849350›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

The molecular and cellular basis of taste coding in the legs of Drosophila.

Frederick Ling, Anupama Dahanukar, Linnea A Weiss, Jae Young Kwon, John R Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Gustatory avoidance of fatty acids byProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Taste evolution in an herbivorous drosophilid.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frederick LingDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
Anupama DahanukarDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, Department of Entomology, Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 94720, and.
Linnea A WeissDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
Jae Young KwonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 440-746, Korea.
John R CarlsonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, john.carlson@yale.edu.

Funding

ANALYSIS OF ODORANT RECEPTOR GENESR01DC004729 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John R Carlson · 2001 to 2026
$9.2M
Analysis of a large family of taste receptorsR01DC011697 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John R Carlson · 2011 to 2026
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004729NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the principles of taste coding, it is necessary to understand the functional organization of the taste organs. Although the labellum of the Drosophila melanogaster head has been described in detail, the tarsal segments of the legs, which collectively contain more taste sensilla than the labellum, have received much less attention. We performed a systematic anatomical, physiological, and molecular analysis of the tarsal sensilla of Drosophila. We construct an anatomical map of all five tarsal segments of each female leg. The taste sensilla of the female foreleg are systematically tested with a panel of 40 diverse compounds, yielding a response matrix of ∼500 sensillum-tastant combinations. Six types of sensilla are characterized. One type was tuned remarkably broadly: it responded to 19 of 27 bitter compounds tested, as well as sugars; another type responded to neither. The midleg is similar but distinct from the foreleg. The response specificities of the tarsal sensilla differ from those of the labellum, as do n-dimensional taste spaces constructed for each organ, enhancing the capacity of the fly to encode and respond to gustatory information. We examined the expression patterns of all 68 gustatory receptors (Grs). A total of 28 Gr-GAL4 drivers are expressed in the legs. We constructed a receptor-to-sensillum map of the legs and a receptor-to-neuron map. Fourteen Gr-GAL4 drivers are expressed uniquely in the bitter-sensing neuron of the sensillum that is tuned exceptionally broadly. Integration of the molecular and physiological maps provides insight into the underlying basis of taste coding.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAlkaloidsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleHindlimbLuminescent ProteinsMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningReceptors, Cell SurfaceSense OrgansSensillaSensory Receptor CellsStimulation, ChemicalAlkaloidsDrosophila ProteinsGAL4 protein, Drosophilagustatory receptor, DrosophilaLuminescent ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceTranscription FactorsDrosophilaGrgustatory receptorlegsphysiologytaste

Identifiers

PMID24849350
PMCPMC4028494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.