ReviewDrugs2014
Gene therapy for primary immunodeficiencies: current status and future prospects.
Review in Drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Therapy for Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome: Improved Outcome and Quality of Life.Journal of blood medicine · 2021Review
- Gene therapy in PIDs, hemoglobin, ocular, neurodegenerative, and hemophilia B disorders.Open life sciences · 2021Review
- Massively-Parallelized, Deterministic Mechanoporation for Intracellular Delivery.Nano letters · 2020Article
- Elucidation of the Effects of a Current X-SCID Therapy on Intestinal Lymphoid Organogenesis Using an In Vivo Animal Model.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Article
- The Evidence for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Congenital Neutrophil Disorders: A Comprehensive Review by the Inborn Errors Working Party Group of the EBMT.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- NADPH Oxidase Deficiency: A Multisystem Approach.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2017Review
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Primary Immune Deficiency Disorders.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2016Review
- Establishment and Maintenance of the Human Naïve CD4Frontiers in pediatrics · 2016Review
- Clinical development of gene therapy: results and lessons from recent successes.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2016Review
- Clinical applications of gene therapy for primary immunodeficiencies.Human gene therapy · 2015Review
- History and current status of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.Seminars in perinatology · 2015Review
- High-level production of replication-defective human immunodeficiency type 1 virus vector particles using helper-dependent adenovirus vectors.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene therapy using autologous haematopoietic stem cells offers a valuable treatment option for patients with primary immunodeficiencies who do not have access to an HLA-matched donor, although such treatments have not been without their problems. This review details gene therapy trials for X-linked and adenosine deaminase (ADA)-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) and chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). X-linked SCID was chosen for gene therapy because of previous 'natural' genetic correction through a reversion event in a single lymphoid precursor, demonstrating limited thymopoiesis and restricted T-lymphocyte receptor repertoire, showing selective advantage of progenitors possessing the wild-type gene. In early studies, patients were treated with long terminal repeats-intact gamma-retroviral vectors, without additional chemotherapy. Early results demonstrated gene-transduced cells, sustained thymopoiesis, and a diverse T-lymphocyte repertoire with normal function. Serious adverse effects were subsequently reported in 5 of 20 patients, with T-lymphocyte leukaemia developing, secondary to the viral vector integrating adjacent to a known oncogene. New trials using self-inactivating gamma-retroviral vectors are progressing. Trials for ADA-SCID using gamma-retroviral vectors have been successful, with no similar serious adverse effects reported; trials using lentiviral vectors are in progress. Patients with WAS and CGD treated with early gamma-retroviral vectors have developed similar lymphoproliferative adverse effects to those seen in X-SCID--current trials are using new-generation vectors. Targeted gene insertion using homologous recombination of corrected gene sequences by cellular DNA repair pathways following targeted DNA breakage will improve efficacy and safety of gene therapy. A number of new techniques are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.