Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24848659›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2014

Medicalization of global health 1: has the global health agenda become too medicalized?

Jocalyn Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unity of Disease and Unity of Cure: An Evidence-based Perspective.Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Social Vulnerability, Frailty, and Their Association With Mortality in Older Adults Living in Rural Tanzania.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Infective Endocarditis in the Elderly: Challenges and Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CyberGenomics: Application of Behavioral Genetics in Cybersecurity.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jocalyn ClarkCommunications & Development Unit, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; j.clark@utoronto.ca; jocalyn.clark@icddrb.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicalization analyses have roots in sociology and have critical usefulness for understanding contemporary health issues including the 'post-2015 global health agenda'. Medicalization is more complex than just 'disease mongering'--it is a process and not only an outcome; has both positive and negative elements; can be partial rather than complete; and is often sought or challenged by patients or others in the health field. It is understood to be expanding rather than contracting, plays out at the level of interaction or of definitions and agenda-setting, and is said to be largely harmful and costly to individuals and societies. Medicalization of global health issues would overemphasise the role of health care to health; define and frame issues in relation to disease, treatment strategies, and individual behaviour; promote the role of medical professionals and models of care; find support in industry or other advocates of technologies and pharmaceuticals; and discount social contexts, causes, and solutions. In subsequent articles, three case studies are explored, which critically examine predominant issues on the global health agenda: global mental health, non-communicable disease, and universal health coverage. A medicalization lens helps uncover areas where the global health agenda and its framing of problems are shifted toward medical and technical solutions, neglecting necessary social, community, or political action.

Indexed as

Global HealthMedicalizationHealth PrioritiesHealthy People ProgramsHumansdevelopmentGlobal healthmedicalizationsociology

Identifiers

PMID24848659
PMCPMC4028930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.