Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24848655›Full record

ReviewGlobal health action2014

Public policy, health system, and community actions against illness as platforms for response to NCDs in Tanzania: a narrative review.

Emmy Metta, Beverly Msambichaka, Mary Mwangome, Daniel J Nyato, Marjolein Dieleman, Hinke Haisma, Paul Klatser, Eveline Geubbels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health action, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emmy MettaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; emetta@ihi.or.tz; emetta2000@yahoo.com.
Beverly MsambichakaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mary MwangomeIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Daniel J NyatoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Marjolein DielemanRoyal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hinke HaismaFaculty of Spatial Sciences, Population Research Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paul KlatserRoyal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eveline GeubbelsIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost low- and middle- income countries are facing a rise of the burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) alongside the persistent burden of infectious diseases. This narrative review aims to provide an inventory of how the existing policy environment, health system, and communities are addressing the NCDs situation in Tanzania and identify gaps for advancing the NCD research and policy agenda. METHODOLOGY: A literature search was performed on PubMed and Google scholar with full text retrieval from HINARI of English language articles published between 2000 and 2012. Documents were read to extract information on what Tanzanian actors were doing that contributed to NCDs prevention, treatment, and control, and a narration was written out of these. Reference lists of all retrieved articles were searched for additional relevant articles. Websites of organizations active in the field of NCDs including the Government of Tanzania and WHO were searched for reports and grey literature.

resultsLack of a specific and overarching NCD policy has slowed and fragmented the implementation of existing strategies to prevent and control NCDs and their determinants. The health system is not prepared to deal with the rising NCD burden although there are random initiatives to improve this situation. How the community is responding to these emerging conditions is still unknown, and the current health-seeking behavior and perceptions on the risk factors may not favor control of NCDs and their risk factors. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: There is limited information on the burden and determinants of NCDs to inform the design of an integrative and multisectorial policy. Evidence on effective interventions for NCD services in primary care levels and on community perceptions on NCDs and their care seeking is virtually absent. Research and public health interventions must be anchored in the policy, health system, and community platforms for a holistic response.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationPublic PolicyChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansPreventive MedicineTanzaniacommunity responsehealth systemNCDpolicy

Identifiers

PMID24848655
PMCPMC4028932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.