ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2015
Biomechanical evaluation of suture-holding properties of native and tissue-engineered articular cartilage.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Evaluation of Commercially Available Fibrin Sealants for Cartilage Repair.Cartilage · 2024Article
- Article
- Bioengineering Vascular Networks to Study Angiogenesis and Vascularization of Physiologically Relevant Tissue ModelsACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2020Article
- Structure-function relationships of fetal ovine articular cartilage.Acta biomaterialia · 2019Article
- Active agents, biomaterials, and technologies to improve biolubrication and strengthen soft tissues.Biomaterials · 2018Review
- Tissue engineering toward temporomandibular joint disc regeneration.Science translational medicine · 2018Article
- Tissue engineering potential of human dermis-isolated adult stem cells from multiple anatomical locations.PloS one · 2017Article
- Nondestructive Techniques to Evaluate the Characteristics and Development of Engineered Cartilage.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2016Review
- Initiation of Chondrocyte Self-Assembly Requires an Intact Cytoskeletal Network.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2016Article
- Cartilage immunoprivilege depends on donor source and lesion location.Acta biomaterialia · 2015Article
- Neocartilage integration in temporomandibular joint discs: physical and enzymatic methods.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine suture-holding properties of tissue-engineered neocartilage relative to native articular cartilage. To this end, suture pull-out strength was quantified for native articular cartilage and for neocartilages possessing various mechanical properties. Suture-holding properties were examined in vitro and in vivo. Neocartilage from bovine chondrocytes was engineered using two sets of exogenous stimuli, resulting in neotissue of different biochemical compositions. Compressive and tensile properties and glycosaminoglycan, collagen, and pyridinoline cross-link contents were assayed (study 1). Suture pull-out strength was compared between neocartilage constructs, and bovine and leporine native cartilage. Uniaxial pull-out test until failure was performed after passing 6-0 Vicryl through each tissue (study 2). Subsequently, neocartilage was implanted into a rabbit model to examine short-term suture-holding ability in vivo (study 3). Neocartilage glycosaminoglycan and collagen content per wet weight reached 4.55 ± 1.62% and 4.21 ± 0.77%, respectively. Tensile properties for neocartilage constructs reached 2.6 ± 0.77% MPa for Young's modulus and 1.39 ± 0.63 MPa for ultimate tensile strength. Neocartilage reached ~ 33% of suture pull-out strength of native articular cartilage. Neocartilage cross-link content reached 50% of native values, and suture pull-out strength correlated positively with cross-link content (R² = 0.74). Neocartilage sutured into rabbit osteochondral defects was successfully maintained for 3 weeks. This study shows that pyridinoline cross-links in neocartilage may be vital in controlling suture pull-out strength. Neocartilage produced in vitro with one-third of native tissue pull-out strength appears sufficient for construct suturing and retention in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.