Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24848465›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014

Changes in input strength and number are driven by distinct mechanisms at the retinogeniculate synapse.

David J Lin, Erin Kang, Chinfei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Increasing Spontaneous Retinal Activity before Eye Opening Accelerates the Development of Geniculate Receptive Fields.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David J LinDepartment of Neurology, F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Erin KangDepartment of Neurology, F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Chinfei ChenDepartment of Neurology, F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and chinfei.chen@childrens.harvard.edu.

Funding

SYNAPTIC MECHANISMS IN HIPPOCAMPAL EPILEPTOGENESISP30HD018655 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI POMEROY, SCOTT LOREN · 1985 to 2015
$26.2M
Short-term plasticity of the retinogeniculate synapseR01EY013613 · NEI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI Chinfei Chen · 2003 to 2026
$10.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS R01 EY013613NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD18655NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD018655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that vision influences the functional remodeling of the mouse retinogeniculate synapse, the connection between retinal ganglion cells and thalamic relay neurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Initially, each relay neuron receives a large number of weak retinal inputs. Over a 2- to 3-wk developmental window, the majority of these inputs are eliminated, and the remaining inputs are strengthened. This period of refinement is followed by a critical period when visual experience changes the strength and connectivity of the retinogeniculate synapse. Visual deprivation of mice by dark rearing from postnatal day (P)20 results in a dramatic weakening of synaptic strength and recruitment of additional inputs. In the present study we asked whether experience-dependent plasticity at the retinogeniculate synapse represents a homeostatic response to changing visual environment. We found that visual experience starting at P20 following visual deprivation from birth results in weakening of existing retinal inputs onto relay neurons without significant changes in input number, consistent with homeostatic synaptic scaling of retinal inputs. On the other hand, the recruitment of new inputs to the retinogeniculate synapse requires previous visual experience prior to the critical period. Taken together, these findings suggest that diverse forms of homeostatic plasticity drive experience-dependent remodeling at the retinogeniculate synapse.

Indexed as

Long-Term PotentiationAnimalsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGeniculate BodiesHomeostasisInterneuronsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRetinal Ganglion CellsSynapsesVisual Pathwayscritical periodsynapse developmentsynaptic plasticitythalamusvision

Identifiers

PMID24848465
PMCPMC4122736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.