ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014
Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nature's therapeutic power: a study on the psychophysiological effects of touching ornamental grass in Chinese women.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- The efficacy of sensory neural entrainment on acute and chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of pain · 2023Article
- A novel thermoelectric device integrated with a psychophysical paradigm to study pain processing in human subjects.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2023Article
- Vigilance to Painful Laser Stimuli is Associated with Increased State Anxiety and Tense Arousal.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Cortical interaction of bilateral inputs is similar for noxious and innocuous stimuli but leads to different perceptual effects.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Behavioral, Physiological and EEG Activities Associated with Conditioned Fear as Sensors for Fear and Anxiety.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Pearls and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability-part I.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Review
- A Deep Brain Stimulation Trial Period for Treating Chronic Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Haptic exploration attenuates and alters somatosensory cortical oscillations.The Journal of physiology · 2018Article
- Vigilance behaviors and EEG activity in sustained attention may affect acute pain.Journal of systems and integrative neuroscience · 2017Article
- Oscillatory EEG activity induced by conditioning stimuli during fear conditioning reflects Salience and Valence of these stimuli more than Expectancy.Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Commentary: Differential Cerebral Response to Somatosensory Stimulation of an Acupuncture Point vs. Two Non-Acupuncture Points Measured with EEG and fMRI.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
- Neuronal Oscillations in Various Frequency Bands Differ between Pain and Touch.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
- Functional role of induced gamma oscillatory responses in processing noxious and innocuous sensory events in humans.Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The non-phase-locked EEG response to painful stimuli has usually been characterized as decreased oscillatory activity (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in the alpha band. Increased activity (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the gamma band has been reported more recently. We have now tested the hypothesis that the non-phase-locked responses to nonpainful electric cutaneous stimuli are different from those to painful cutaneous laser stimuli when the baseline salience of the two stimuli is the same and the salience during the protocol is modulated by count laser and count electric tasks. Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train at intensities that produced the same baseline salience in the same somatic location. The response to the laser stimulus was characterized by five windows (designated windows I-V) in the time-frequency domain: early (200-400 ms) and late (600-1,400 ms) delta/theta ERS, 500-900 ms alpha ERD, 1,200-1,600 ms beta ERS (rebound), and 800-1,200 ms gamma ERS. Similar ERS/ERD windows of activity were found for the electric stimulus. Individual participants very commonly had activity in windows consistent with the overall analysis. Linear regression of ERS/ERD for parietal channels was most commonly found for sensory (pain or unpleasantness)- or attention (salience)-related measures. Overall, the main effect for modality was found in window I-delta/theta and window V-gamma, and the Modality with Task interaction was found in all five windows. All significant interaction terms included Modality as a factor. Therefore, Modality was the most common factor explaining our results, which is consistent with our hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.