Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24847943›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Peptide carrier-mediated non-covalent delivery of unmodified cisplatin, methotrexate and other agents via intravenous route to the brain.

Gobinda Sarkar, Geoffry L Curran, Jann N Sarkaria, Val J Lowe, Robert B Jenkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pharmacokinetics of protein and peptide conjugates.Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2019
    Review
  7. A flow cytometry-basedThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. On glioblastoma and the search for a cure: where do we stand?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gobinda SarkarDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Geoffry L CurranDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Val J LoweDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Robert B JenkinsDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid pre-clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents against brain cancers and other neurological disorders remains largely unattained due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which limits transport of most therapeutic compounds to the brain. A synthetic peptide carrier, K16ApoE, was previously developed that enabled transport of target proteins to the brain by mimicking a ligand-receptor system. The peptide carrier was found to generate transient BBB permeability, which was utilized for non-covalent delivery of cisplatin, methotrexate and other compounds to the brain. APPROACH: Brain delivery of the chemotherapeutics and other agents was achieved either by injecting the carrier peptide and the drugs separately or as a mixture, to the femoral vein. A modification of the method comprised injection of K16ApoE pre-mixed with cetuximab, followed by injection of a 'small-molecule' drug. PRINCIPAL

findingsSeven-of-seven different small molecules were successfully delivered to the brain via K16ApoE. Depending on the method, brain uptake with K16ApoE was 0.72-1.1% for cisplatin and 0.58-0.92% for methotrexate (34-50-fold and 54-92 fold greater for cisplatin and methotrexate, respectively, with K16ApoE than without). Visually intense brain-uptake of Evans Blue, Light Green SF and Crocein scarlet was also achieved. Direct intracranial injection of EB show locally restricted distribution of the dye in the brain, whereas K16ApoE-mediated intravenous injection of EB resulted in the distribution of the dye throughout the brain. Experiments with insulin suggest that ligand-receptor signaling intrinsic to the BBB provides a natural means for passive transport of some molecules across the BBB. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that the carrier peptide can non-covalently transport various chemotherapeutic agents to the brain. Thus, the method offers an avenue for pre-clinical evaluation of various small and large therapeutic molecules against brain tumors and other neurological disorders.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBiological TransportBlood-Brain BarrierCisplatinColoring AgentsDrug CarriersFemaleInjections, IntravenousInsulinIodine RadioisotopesMethotrexateMiceMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesCisplatinColoring AgentsDrug CarriersInsulinIodine RadioisotopesMethotrexatePeptides

Identifiers

PMID24847943
PMCPMC4029735
OpenAlexW2002878845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.