Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24847683›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2015

Design and implementation of a biomolecular concentration tracker.

Victoria Hsiao, Emmanuel L C de los Santos, Weston R Whitaker, John E Dueber, Richard M Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regulation strategies for two-output biomolecular networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Autonomous and Assisted Control for Synthetic Microbiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Control theory meets synthetic biology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victoria HsiaoDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California United States.
Emmanuel L C de los Santos
Weston R Whitaker
John E Dueber
Richard M Murray

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRYT32GM007616 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STERNBERG, PAUL WARREN · 1985 to 2019
$22.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5 T32 GM07616NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a field, synthetic biology strives to engineer increasingly complex artificial systems in living cells. Active feedback in closed loop systems offers a dynamic and adaptive way to ensure constant relative activity independent of intrinsic and extrinsic noise. In this work, we use synthetic protein scaffolds as a modular and tunable mechanism for concentration tracking through negative feedback. Input to the circuit initiates scaffold production, leading to colocalization of a two-component system and resulting in the production of an inhibitory antiscaffold protein. Using a combination of modeling and experimental work, we show that the biomolecular concentration tracker circuit achieves dynamic protein concentration tracking in Escherichia coli and that steady state outputs can be tuned.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFeedback, PhysiologicalHistidine KinaseKineticsLeucine ZippersPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesProtein KinasesEscherichia coli ProteinsHistidine KinasePhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesProtein Kinasesfeedback circuitslive-cell trackingnegative feedbacksynthetic protein scaffoldstwo-component systems

Identifiers

PMID24847683
PMCPMC4384833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.