Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24847354›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2014

Combining affinity proteomics and network context to identify new phosphatase substrates and adapters in growth pathways.

Francesca Sacco, Karsten Boldt, Alberto Calderone, Simona Panni, Serena Paoluzi, Luisa Castagnoli, Marius Ueffing, Gianni Cesareni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Review of DUSP26: Structure, Regulation and Relevance in Human Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesca SaccoDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome, Italy.
Karsten BoldtDivision of Experimental Ophthalmology, Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen Tuebingen, Germany.
Alberto CalderoneDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome, Italy.
Simona PanniDepartment DiBEST, University of Calabria Rende, Italy.
Serena PaoluziDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome, Italy.
Luisa CastagnoliDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome, Italy.
Marius UeffingDivision of Experimental Ophthalmology, Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen Tuebingen, Germany ; Research Unit for Protein Science, Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg, Germany.
Gianni CesareniDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome, Italy ; Istituto Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione Santa Lucia Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITSTZ eyetrial · DEFondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation homoeostasis is tightly controlled and pathological conditions are caused by subtle alterations of the cell phosphorylation profile. Altered levels of kinase activities have already been associated to specific diseases. Less is known about the impact of phosphatases, the enzymes that down-regulate phosphorylation by removing the phosphate groups. This is partly due to our poor understanding of the phosphatase-substrate network. Much of phosphatase substrate specificity is not based on intrinsic enzyme specificity with the catalytic pocket recognizing the sequence/structure context of the phosphorylated residue. In addition many phosphatase catalytic subunits do not form a stable complex with their substrates. This makes the inference and validation of phosphatase substrates a non-trivial task. Here, we present a novel approach that builds on the observation that much of phosphatase substrate selection is based on the network of physical interactions linking the phosphatase to the substrate. We first used affinity proteomics coupled to quantitative mass spectrometry to saturate the interactome of eight phosphatases whose down regulations was shown to affect the activation of the RAS-PI3K pathway. By integrating information from functional siRNA with protein interaction information, we develop a strategy that aims at inferring phosphatase physiological substrates. Graph analysis is used to identify protein scaffolds that may link the catalytic subunits to their substrates. By this approach we rediscover several previously described phosphatase substrate interactions and characterize two new protein scaffolds that promote the dephosphorylation of PTPN11 and ERK by DUSP18 and DUSP26, respectively.

Indexed as

cell biologyphosphataseprotein protein interactionsignal transductionsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID24847354
PMCPMC4019850
OpenAlexW2087261318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.