ReviewFrontiers in plant science2014
Polyamines and abiotic stress in plants: a complex relationship.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
158 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 442 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abiotic Stress in Crop Production.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Pre-exposure to UV-B irradiation induces antioxidant enzymes and mitigatesPlant signaling & behavior · 2026Article
- Review
- Alterations in Arginase Activity and Polyamine Metabolism Contribute to the Mode of Action of Canavanine in Tomato Roots.Biology · 2026Article
- The MFS transporter BcTpo1 governs the oxidative stress response and infection of Botrytis cinerea.Crop health · 2026Article
- The role of spermidine in plants and humans: a pathway from climate change adaptation to health benefits.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
- Polyamine-mediated crosstalk in plant-microbe systems: implications for stress tolerance and crop protection.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Stress-responsive transcription factor families are key components of the core abiotic stress response in maize.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Integrated physiological, biochemical, and transcriptomic analysis of the cold-sensitive response in Mussaenda anomala.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Arginine, a key amino acid for nitrogen nutrition and metabolism of forest trees.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Impact of putrescine on essential oil composition, free polyamines content and expression of related genes (DXR and TPS2) in Thymus daenensis under drought stress.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Identification, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Expression Pattern of Polyamine Biosynthesis Gene Family in Pepper.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Antioxidant and Tyrosinase-Inhibitory Activities and Biological Bioactivities of Flavonoid Derivatives fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Growth, Gas Exchange, and Phytochemical Quality of Nasturtium (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exogenous putrescine enhances salt tolerance inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Polyamine impact on physiology of early stages of reef-building corals-insights from rearing experiments and RNA-Seq analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Relationship between the GABA Pathway and Signaling of Other Regulatory Molecules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Recent Insights into the Physio-Biochemical and Molecular Mechanisms of Low Temperature Stress in Tomato.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Response of Purslane Plants Grown under Salinity Stress and Biostimulant Formulations.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The physiological relationship between abiotic stress in plants and polyamines was reported more than 40 years ago. Ever since there has been a debate as to whether increased polyamines protect plants against abiotic stress (e.g., due to their ability to deal with oxidative radicals) or cause damage to them (perhaps due to hydrogen peroxide produced by their catabolism). The observation that cellular polyamines are typically elevated in plants under both short-term as well as long-term abiotic stress conditions is consistent with the possibility of their dual effects, i.e., being protectors from as well as perpetrators of stress damage to the cells. The observed increase in tolerance of plants to abiotic stress when their cellular contents are elevated by either exogenous treatment with polyamines or through genetic engineering with genes encoding polyamine biosynthetic enzymes is indicative of a protective role for them. However, through their catabolic production of hydrogen peroxide and acrolein, both strong oxidizers, they can potentially be the cause of cellular harm during stress. In fact, somewhat enigmatic but strong positive relationship between abiotic stress and foliar polyamines has been proposed as a potential biochemical marker of persistent environmental stress in forest trees in which phenotypic symptoms of stress are not yet visible. Such markers may help forewarn forest managers to undertake amelioration strategies before the appearance of visual symptoms of stress and damage at which stage it is often too late for implementing strategies for stress remediation and reversal of damage. This review provides a comprehensive and critical evaluation of the published literature on interactions between abiotic stress and polyamines in plants, and examines the experimental strategies used to understand the functional significance of this relationship with the aim of improving plant productivity, especially under conditions of abiotic stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.