Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24847217›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014

Cortico-cortical communication dynamics.

Per E Roland, Claus C Hilgetag, Gustavo Deco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emergence of Neuronal Synchronisation in Coupled Areas.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Communication dynamics in complex brain networks.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Charting moment-to-moment brain signal variability from early to late childhood.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Per E RolandDepartment of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
Claus C HilgetagDepartment of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany ; Department of Health Sciences, Boston University Boston, MA, USA.
Gustavo DecoDepartment of Technology, University of Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain.
Boston University · USPompeu Fabra University · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In principle, cortico-cortical communication dynamics is simple: neurons in one cortical area communicate by sending action potentials that release glutamate and excite their target neurons in other cortical areas. In practice, knowledge about cortico-cortical communication dynamics is minute. One reason is that no current technique can capture the fast spatio-temporal cortico-cortical evolution of action potential transmission and membrane conductances with sufficient spatial resolution. A combination of optogenetics and monosynaptic tracing with virus can reveal the spatio-temporal cortico-cortical dynamics of specific neurons and their targets, but does not reveal how the dynamics evolves under natural conditions. Spontaneous ongoing action potentials also spread across cortical areas and are difficult to separate from structured evoked and intrinsic brain activity such as thinking. At a certain state of evolution, the dynamics may engage larger populations of neurons to drive the brain to decisions, percepts and behaviors. For example, successfully evolving dynamics to sensory transients can appear at the mesoscopic scale revealing how the transient is perceived. As a consequence of these methodological and conceptual difficulties, studies in this field comprise a wide range of computational models, large-scale measurements (e.g., by MEG, EEG), and a combination of invasive measurements in animal experiments. Further obstacles and challenges of studying cortico-cortical communication dynamics are outlined in this critical review.

Indexed as

cortical areasmembrane potential dynamicsspiking dynamicsspontaneous activitysynaptic transmission

Identifiers

PMID24847217
PMCPMC4017159
OpenAlexW2072553732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.