Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24847212›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2014

Neuronal specializations for the processing of interaural difference cues in the chick.

Harunori Ohmori

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inhibitory Neural Circuits in the Mammalian Auditory Midbrain.Journal of experimental neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2016
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Functional organization of the mammalian auditory midbrain.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2015
    Review
  8. Modeling binaural responses in the auditory brainstem to electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Editorial: Inhibitory function in auditory processing.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harunori OhmoriDepartment of Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sound information is encoded as a series of spikes of the auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), and then transmitted to the brainstem auditory nuclei. Features such as timing and level are extracted from ANFs activity and further processed as the interaural time difference (ITD) and the interaural level difference (ILD), respectively. These two interaural difference cues are used for sound source localization by behaving animals. Both cues depend on the head size of animals and are extremely small, requiring specialized neural properties in order to process these cues with precision. Moreover, the sound level and timing cues are not processed independently from one another. Neurons in the nucleus angularis (NA) are specialized for coding sound level information in birds and the ILD is processed in the posterior part of the dorsal lateral lemniscus nucleus (LLDp). Processing of ILD is affected by the phase difference of binaural sound. Temporal features of sound are encoded in the pathway starting in nucleus magnocellularis (NM), and ITD is processed in the nucleus laminaris (NL). In this pathway a variety of specializations are found in synapse morphology, neuronal excitability, distribution of ion channels and receptors along the tonotopic axis, which reduces spike timing fluctuation in the ANFs-NM synapse, and imparts precise and stable ITD processing to the NL. Moreover, the contrast of ITD processing in NL is enhanced over a wide range of sound level through the activity of GABAergic inhibitory systems from both the superior olivary nucleus (SON) and local inhibitory neurons that follow monosynaptic to NM activity.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionChickensCuesNeuronsSound Localizationbrainstem auditory nucleusinteraural difference cuesphasic inhibitionSONtonic inhibition

Identifiers

PMID24847212
PMCPMC4023016
OpenAlexW2162682863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.