Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24847022›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2014

Integrons: past, present, and future.

Michael R Gillings

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 291 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
291citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

291 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GlobalEnvironmental science and ecotechnology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic architecture and functional dynamics of integrons in Staphylococcus aureus resistance.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Role of Mobilome in Carbapenem Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

231 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael R GillingsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia michael.gillings@mq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrons are versatile gene acquisition systems commonly found in bacterial genomes. They are ancient elements that are a hot spot for genomic complexity, generating phenotypic diversity and shaping adaptive responses. In recent times, they have had a major role in the acquisition, expression, and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Assessing the ongoing threats posed by integrons requires an understanding of their origins and evolutionary history. This review examines the functions and activities of integrons before the antibiotic era. It shows how antibiotic use selected particular integrons from among the environmental pool of these elements, such that integrons carrying resistance genes are now present in the majority of Gram-negative pathogens. Finally, it examines the potential consequences of widespread pollution with the novel integrons that have been assembled via the agency of human antibiotic use and speculates on the potential uses of integrons as platforms for biotechnology.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene OrderGenome, BacterialHomologous RecombinationIntegronsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24847022
PMCPMC4054258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.